The Election of 1876

The History of the Controversial Election That Ended Reconstruction

By: Charles River Editors

Narrated by: Scott Clem

Length: 1 hr and 16 mins

Publisher's summary

It seems that every time a presidential election rolls around in America, voters are told that the nation is at a critical fork in its history, and that the decisions reached and the candidates elected will change the course of history. While this is always true to some extent, there are times when it is true to a critical extent.

Such was the case in 1876, when the country, weary of four years of Civil War and more than a decade of Reconstruction, was once again on the brink of splitting. While the Northern states celebrated the centennial of American Independence, the South found itself chaffing under the weight of federal occupation. At the same time, the entire nation was shocked and horrified at the direction the Indian Wars in the West were going, culminating just weeks before the election with George Custer's shocking defeat at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.

Many assumed that President Ulysses S. Grant, the popular Civil War general who was still a relatively young man at the end of his second term in office, would surely run for a third, but many Americans knew nothing of the scandals and corruption that had surrounded Grant's administration, and he wanted to keep it that way, preferring to be remembered as a successful general rather than a failed president. Thus, after extensive consultations with his advisors, he decided to retire from political life, leaving the Republican nomination wide open. At the same time, Southern politicians were beginning to make a comeback and the Democratic Party was gaining strength, especially in the former Confederate states. The South hoped that if it could once again win the White House, it could finally resume its position as an equal part of the nation, rather than a section being punished for its past.

All of this set the stage for one of the strangest interludes in American history. As the nation's two major parties each put forth a large slate of candidates for nomination, two candidates had to come to the fore, and each party selected both a presidential and vice-presidential candidate. These four men ran a bitterly contested race just to reach the general election, and that general election became the most controversial in American history.

By the time results rolled in, Democrat Samuel Tilden had won the popular vote and was up by 19 electoral votes, but 20 electoral votes were disputed, and despite claims of fraud, the two sides eventually forged the Compromise of 1877, which gave the presidency to the Republican Rutherford B. Hayes in exchange for the removal of federal troops from the South. The Compromise effectively ended the Reconstruction era, and while it helped bring about the sectional reconciliation of the country, it also allowed the solid South to emerge, which included the implementation of Jim Crow across the region. In effect, the election ensured another major battle over the civil rights of minorities would ensue decades later.

©2016 Charles River Editors (P)2017 Charles River Editors

Couldn't get past first chapter

Would you try another book from Charles River Editors and/or Scott Clem?

I wrote my thesis on the election of 1848 so my knowledge might be a little more extensive than most but as soon as I heard the line "Grant was the least politically experienced President up to this point" I turned it off. Zachary Taylor would like to say "hold my beer." Taylor literally could barely write. He was considered a buffoon of a general and his only political experience was being the cousin of a former President. Also the person who narrates this pronounces Rutherford wrong EVERY SINGLE TIME. He pronounces it ROOTHAFORD which just blows my mind that some how got past the editing phase. It isn't a big deal but when the focus of the entire book is on this person, at the very least get the pronunciation correct. I feel I was generous with 3 stars but really this was bad.

What was most disappointing about Charles River Editors’s story?

I wrote my thesis on the election of 1848 so my knowledge might be a little more extensive than most but as soon as I heard the line "Grant was the least politically experienced President up to this point" I turned it off. Zachary Taylor would like to say "hold my beer." Taylor literally could barely write. He was considered a buffoon of a general and his only political experience was being the cousin of a former President. .

What did you like about the performance? What did you dislike?

The person who narrates this pronounces Rutherford wrong EVERY SINGLE TIME. He pronounces it ROOTHAFORD which just blows my mind that some how got past the editing phase. It isn't a big deal but when the focus of the entire book is on this person, at the very least get the pronunciation correct. I feel I was generous with 3 stars but really this was bad

Was The Election of 1876 worth the listening time?

No.