The Crusades: The World's Debate

De: Hilaire Belloc

Narrado por: RJ Bayley

Hilaire Belloc (1870-1953) - one of the most prominent Catholic authors of his time - gives a common-sense explanation of why the Crusades were necessary and why they ultimately failed. He argues that the personal and strategic failings of the First Crusade's leaders led to the establishment of a state that could not be sustained and that the absence of such a state left Europe vulnerable to Islamic aggression for centuries afterward.

Writing in 1937, following the demise of the Ottoman Empire, Belloc believed that the West had finally gained the advantage over its mortal foe; however, he also includes a prophetic warning concerning the eventual resurgence of Islam and its enduring desire to destroy Christendom.

©2018 Cavalier Books (P)2018 Cavalier Books

Brutally Honest Assessment

Enjoyed listening to this honest account of the Crusades, the chaotic and savage era that were Medieval Ages. Saladdin often held up as a beacon of moderation in other opologist commentary is not shared in this account as relates to conquered foes. The whole tenor of the times was that of battle between castles, cities, areas of control notwithstanding a faith perspective on Holy Lands reclamation.

Should be required reading for all Westerners

In our post-Christian era the word crusade has become a byword something for which we Westerners should be ashamed, yet in its historical context it is completely the opposite. Thank God for Hilaire Belloc and his succinct telling of the history of The Crusades.

Realistic view of crusades.

The realistic view of the crusades revealed the valor of the feudal era knights and lords.

Historical Detail and Accuracy

It was a solid recounting and analysis of this historical time period, demonstrating the causes behind certain outcomes and developments and providing a better explanation than alternative ones.