Galileo's Error

Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness

De: Philip Goff

Narrado por: Maxwell Caulfield

From a leading philosopher of the mind comes this lucid, provocative argument that offers a radically new picture of human consciousness - panpsychism

Understanding how brains produce consciousness is one of the great scientific challenges of our age. Some philosophers argue that consciousness is something "extra", beyond the physical workings of the brain. Others think that if we persist in our standard scientific methods, our questions about consciousness will eventually be answered. And some suggest that the mystery is so deep, it will never be solved.

In Galileo's Error, Philip Goff offers an exciting alternative that could pave the way forward. Rooted in an analysis of the philosophical underpinnings of modern science and based on the early 20th-century work of Arthur Eddington and Bertrand Russell, Goff makes the case for panpsychism, a theory which posits that consciousness is not confined to biological entities but is a fundamental feature of all physical matter - from subatomic particles to the human brain. Here is the first step on a new path to the final theory of human consciousness.

Cover image: Gold Beam Collision Recorded at STAR. Copyright Brookhaven National Laboratory (Creative Commons). Full image available at Flickr.com.

©2019 Philip Goff (P)2019 Random House Audio

Reseñas de la Crítica

“In Galileo’s Error, Philip Goff argues for a new approach to the scientific study of consciousness. He offers an accessible and compelling analysis of why our felt experience continues to elude scientific explanation and why the theories that describe consciousness as a fundamental feature of matter have been neglected - and why they now deserve serious consideration. This is a must-read for anyone interested in the future of consciousness studies.” (Annaka Harris, best-selling author of Conscious: A Brief Guide to the Fundamental Mystery of the Mind)

“This is one of the clearest accounts I've ever read about the mystery of consciousness, and the way in which one theory about it, panpsychism, does a great deal to explain how it occurs and what it is. Why shouldn't consciousness be a normal property of matter, like mass or electrical charge? This idea has the glorious simplicity of our first realization that the earth goes around the sun, and not vice versa. Suddenly, the universe appears in a new and much more revealing perspective. Philip Goff's book is altogether a splendid introduction to this fascinating idea.” (Philip Pullman, author of the “His Dark Materials” series)

“Philip Goff’s new book, Galileo’s Error, introduces the public to a revolutionary approach to one of the most stubborn of mysteries: How does the brain, with its chemical and electrical processes, give rise to a mind, whose thoughts, emotions, colors and tones we apprehend directly? In this provocative, brave, and clearly written book, Goff makes a compelling case for an initially absurd thesis: that the colors we perceive are instances of universal qualities hidden within all material processes.” (Lee Smolin, author of Einstein’s Unfinished Revolution and founding member of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics)

Connects consciousness with reality and to an ultimate meaning of life.

Inspired philosophical analysis of logical basis for consciousness. Leads reader through complex arguments looking for affirmations and contractions.
He then uses his conclusions to give meaning and understanding to spiritual ideas that will enhance our view of our place in the universe.

Challenging details with periodic “aha moments”

At times so very satisfying. Like a well-written mystery story. Countless clues, but whatever does it all mean! How will it end? I guess we’ll all know as soon as Mr. Goff does.

Well thought out, but at the end something doesn’t fully click

The book is well thought out. It provides a good overview of different approaches to consciousness. That said, while the author does not explicitly claim that it is the sole answer, the book seems to lean heavily in the direction of pan-psychism.

This is the tip of the spear!

As a pragmatic scientist, who studying the roots of consciousness, and isn’t afraid to explore all the information available — it was amazing to finally find an author can bring together the algorithm which we live in and put it in words that most people can understand so that hopefully we can evolve before we kill ourselves.

I only have one suggestion for the author, which is it’s important that you have a pragmatic meditative breakthrough. Your next book it would be great if you addressed the factual data that meditation is being observed through fMRI. It gives us a much more tangible baseline of awareness around how those who are advanced meditators (and please let’s stop using the word mystics) connect to the fundamental universal
Conscious state. That data will also open up a whole New World of brain states the frequencies connected to them, and how that might align with a fundamental consciousness that we could explore through pen psychist ideas.

This is a fantastic book that could change a lot of peoples lives and spark curiosity. My only fear is that it’s too advanced for how locked in most of the world is to the mechanisms and that empty space.

Pan-Psychism Explained

Goff makes a great case for the marriage of physics with philosophy. Finding the words, science, and data to explain consciousness have been elusive since the beginning of time. Finally a good explanation for not just how, but why consciousness pervades the universe.

Amazing

Unique and thorough explanation of panpsychism and consciousness’ role in reality. Or better yet: an exploration of the nuances and research that make the consciousness ‘problem’ the most interesting and pertinent question to answer in our time... reading this book could save the world.

This scholar’s work brings us closer to a true theory of everything than ever before.

Trust me on this one - read this book and then read Food of the Gods. 🤯

Good but basic

The book is well-written and builds an excellent arena for competing belief systems. He lays out relevant historical anchor points where world view has changed in the last millennium and articulated that much of our culture’s current popular philosophical position has no more proof than angels and magic beans. He doesn’t say magic beans but he does talk about why angels should not be factored into an evidence-based view of reality than should the idea that matter is dead and mechanistic. The author concludes that pan-psychism shakes out as the most likely accurate explanation of reality but I felt he defended materialism with more substance even while he pointed out its flaws and tendency to use blind faith arguments while criticizing blind faith. I would have liked more discussion of modern pan-psychism because, in the end, I gained little to use in my debates with tribalistic, self-involved, dogmatic worshipers of science as a religion rather than a process for discovery. I will concede that it turned me onto some interesting further study about brain surgery and plant problem solving. I just think he had room to go do much further. It’s a great book if you’re new to the concept of bridging quantum physics and Newtonian physics with consciousness as a principle ingredient. It just feels unfinished.

Uncommonly honest.

Required reading for the Consciousness-obsessed. You'll appreciate this title if you're a fan of Iain McGilchrist or Douglas Hofstadter.

No less than phenomenal. A must-read/listen for anyone interested in contemporary philosophy and the science of consciousness

While I will concede that this book is not for everyone, I would definitely recommend it emphatically to those who may be seeking to put together the puzzle of consciousness, brain science, meaning, morality, and the intrinsic nature of the mind. If you are not turned off but rather excited by the conceptual density of this pursuit, you will adore this book. For me, it provided satisfying answers and exciting new questions related to my ongoing interest in connecting science, spirituality, philosophy, and secular morality. I so love this book that I believe it will be foundational to my continued study of these things. I know for one that I need to go back through it and pick out a long list of authors’ names and titles to continue a newly invigorated curriculum that could finally leave me more satisfied by not just knowing some new philosophy “lingo”, or having familiarity with certain concepts, but, indeed, actually approaching true contentment with a world view i can see as not just logical, but spiritually satisfying. Waaaaay more than one would expect from most any book.