President Donald Trump marks “100 days” in this second term.

He’s certainly been fast off the blocks.

But I want to weigh in for just a bit on the judges.

No: I’m not referring to the judiciary. I’m referring to the media: Those who have so wrong about Trump for so long it defies description.

Just about anyone in the world of journalism who is 30 and older has been pumping out "takes" on Donald Trump since he came down the escalator on June 16, 2015. I certainly have.

And they have been so wrong for so long … the collective sum of the sunk costs is enormous. Hundreds of millions of takes have been taken, predictions made and conclusions rendered. And: They’ve been wrong.

My recommendation is: Ignore them. Watch Trump. He could be transformational and successful.

There’s no question: He’s already an enormous figure in the nation’s history. He’s a president of consequence.

And: He still has over 1,300 days to go.

I’m Hugh Hewitt.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We’re at a critical juncture in history—with the SS America, if you will, buffeted by a political storm that threatens to escalate into a full-blown hurricane.

Our challenges threaten to paralyze markets, turning every investment into a gamble—jeopardizing the American dream.

Donald Trump, our Captain of SS America, sees the distant horizon though. He knows enduring prosperity demands policies etched in stone—tax rates locked in, regulations unshackled, spending reined in.

But he also knows stability is a mirage without massive and difficult reforms.

Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill is a crucial lifeline, providing a guide to safer shores. It offers certainty by securing tax rates, reducing reckless spending, and eliminating regulatory burdens to unleash American innovation and more. Most importantly, formalizing the findings of DOGE, which has uncovered billions lost in bureaucratic inefficiency.

Yet the crew falters.

Republicans must deliver on this bill soon, or the hurricane will overtake us.

It’s time to get it done.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The US Supreme Court this week heard arguments about whether children can be exempted from instruction their parents consider offensive.

What kind of instruction? From the Washington Post: LGBTQ story-books featuring gender transitions; same-sex playground romance; and questioning “cisnormativity” and “power hierarchies.” The picture book “Pride Puppy!” asks students to search a Pride parade for “underwear,” “leather” and a “lip ring.” A book that invites kindergarteners to ponder what it means to be “nonbinary” and “What pronouns fit?” Kindergartners.

Another book for youngsters called “Intersectionalities” comes with a foreword from a Marxist law professor at Columbia explaining the need to teach children not English and math but social consciousness.

When your kindergarten book needs a law professor’s foreword, you know you’re not in Kansas anymore—or anything near age-appropriate education. You’re in the realm of indoctrination. And that’s not what schools are for.

Parents have every right to opt their little one out of this.

The Supreme Court seemed to agree. We’ll find out in late June or early July.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.