Black Marxism

The Making of the Black Radical Tradition, Third Edition

De: Cedric J. Robinson, Robin D.G. Kelley - foreword, Tiffany Willoughby-Herard - preface, Damien Sojoyner - preface

Narrado por: David Sadzin

In this ambitious work, first published in 1983, Cedric Robinson demonstrates that efforts to understand Black people's history of resistance solely through the prism of Marxist theory are incomplete and inaccurate. Marxist analyses tend to presuppose European models of history and experience that downplay the significance of Black people and Black communities as agents of change and resistance. Black radicalism, Robinson argues, must be linked to the traditions of Africa and the unique experiences of Blacks on Western continents, and any analyses of African American history need to acknowledge this.

To illustrate his argument, Robinson traces the emergence of Marxist ideology in Europe, the resistance by Blacks in historically oppressive environments, and the influence of both of these traditions on such important twentieth-century Black radical thinkers as W. E. B. Du Bois, C. L. R. James, and Richard Wright. This revised and updated third edition includes a new preface by Tiffany Willoughby-Herard, and a new foreword by Robin D. G. Kelley.

©1983 Cedric J. Robinson; Preface to the second edition copyright 2000 by The University of North Carolina Press; Foreword to the third edition copyright 2020 by Robin D. G. Kelley; Preface to the third edition copyright 2020 by Damien Sojoyner and Tiffany Willoughby-Herard (P)2022 Tantor

A must read

for anyone curious and passionate about the Black Radical Tradition. 5/5 for the narration as well. This author is so skilled at weaving large ideas and histories spanning centuries seamlessly.

Vital and timeless

This book is massively important and increasingly vital with every passing year. Its extensive archive of the Black radical tradition and clear delineation of the shortcomings of western Marxism should be the spearhead of any intersectional movement against capitalism and white supremacy.

"Racial Capitalism"

Cedric J. Robinson’s Black Marxism is first a history of Black people appearing in historical texts as far back as Herodotus (c. 484 – c. 425 BCE) in ancient Greece, and second a history of “the collisions of the Black and white ‘races’ beginning in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.” Robinson’s thesis connects the evolution of capitalism to its roots in racism (racialism) understood in broad terms to comprise the subjugation of one class/group/nation/race by another (the Irish by the English in the nineteenth century, for example). He uses the term “racial capitalism” to express this process—the necessity of opposing classes for the function of capitalism. As a result, “racialism,” he says, “would inevitably permeate the social structures emergent from capitalism.” Keynes attributed the slow change in the “standard of life of the average man” until the beginning of the eighteenth century to “the remarkable absence of important technical improvements and to the failure of capital to accumulate.” Capital is accumulated, in Marx’s view, through the accretion of “surplus labor” which is the extra time a worker “must add to the working time necessary for his own maintenance . . . in order to produce the means of subsistence for the owners of the means of production.” Robinson ties capitalism’s early exploitation of surplus labor to slave labor and the slave trade noting, “historically, slavery was a critical foundation for capitalism.” Robinson traces the forced transport of Black people from Africa (the diaspora) to Europe, as well as Central, South, and North America as a foundation of early capitalism (and slavery as its form of “primitive accumulation” of capital). In his discussions of slavery, Robinson stresses the sense of the enslaved people with respect to their captors in terms of the slaves’ resistance, hostility, and defiance of the masters—their “Black radicalism.” As Robinson’s text approaches the twentieth century and the influence of Marx, his focus narrows to the significance and character of specific Black leaders including W. E. B. Du Bois, C. L. R. James, and Richard Wright and their respective connections to Marxism’s diverse interpretations. Marxism, says Robinson, “has proven insufficiently radical to expose and root out the racialist order that contaminates its analytic and philosophic applications or to come to effective terms with the implications of its own class origins.”

Excellent history of an underappre side of Marxism

This was an excellent, in-depth look into the history of the Black radical tradition. The content spans several hundred years of Black thought that really contextualizes the civil rights movement and it's leader's understanding of their place in radical history. it was very dense, but the forewords really help understand why this book is so important. super highly recommend to anyone wishing to gain deeper understanding of where Marxism has both failed and triumphed in the face of evolving understanding of race, intersectionality, and internationalism. It is written with wit and clarity, though as I said before, it was quite dense! Not for the casual scholar, but for those who really want some next level historical context and understanding.

This Book is for Smart People

It gets really deep, really quickly and if you do not understand big words, I don’t think you’ll appreciate it. I’m not claiming to be a genius, okay, but you’ll kind of drown in the words if you don’t already read a lot.

Didn’t Care For It

It’s worth reading, for those who have already read up on and are committed to the ideas he argues against, but toxic for those who haven’t. About 1/3 of the book, I listened intently and either reviewed material I’ve heard from other authors, or learned new material, 1/3 of the book I shook my head, in strong disagreement, and 1/3 I nodded in agreement. Not saying my opinion matters, but this guy isn’t a Marxist-Leninist, ML doesn’t guide his thought, though it does influence it. The gist of the book is an attempt at disregarding Marxist-Leninists in favor of a bizarre racial chauvinist non-Marxian dialectic. Then the next page, he writes about modes of production and social movements like Walter Rodney. That, he isn’t, however, and though he himself spells out what readers of Marxist orient will think of this book, he doesn’t escape the guilty verdict, as a bourgeois racial chauvinist.

The book is divisive, as though Marxism and ML and MLM and Trotskyism, etc aren’t divided enough! Avoid until you read Rodney, Fanon, Prashad, Parenti, Lenin, Marx/Engels, etc.

boring and disappointing

if I wanted to read further about white European history I'd have picked up a book with that on the cover. if you're interested in learning about Black Marxism this is not the book for you. 65% of it is going over modern Euorpean history, and while it's nice reading it through a Black lense I'm interested in Black Marxism and learning about the Black radical tradition. only the last 3 chapters had anything worth reading.