The Great Moon Hoax of 1835 stands as one of the most remarkable instances of media deception in history. This series of six articles, published in the New York Sun newspaper between August 25 and August 31, 1835, captivated the public's imagination with tales of fantastic lunar discoveries allegedly made by renowned British astronomer Sir John Herschel. The articles, which claimed to be reprinted from the Edinburgh Journal of Science, described a wealth of life on the Moon, including unicorns, bipedal beavers, and bat-like humanoids. Despite the outlandish nature of these claims, the hoax gained significant traction, drawing in readers and showcasing the power of sensationalistic journalism in the 19th century. At the heart of the Great Moon Hoax was Richard Adams Locke, a journalist working for the New York Sun. Locke, who had a background in science and technology, recognized the public's fascination with astronomical discoveries and saw an opportunity to boost the newspaper's circulation. He drew inspiration from genuine scientific advancements of the era, such as the construction of large telescopes and the ongoing debate about the possibility of life on other worlds. By weaving these elements into a compelling narrative, Locke created a hoax that would capture the attention of readers across the United States and beyond. The first article in the series, published on August 25, 1835, bore the headline "Great Astronomical Discoveries Lately Made by Sir John Herschel, L.L.D. F.R.S. &c. at the Cape of Good Hope." It claimed that Herschel had developed a powerful new telescope capable of observing the lunar surface in unprecedented detail. The article described the telescope as having a lens measuring 24 feet in diameter and a magnifying power of 42,000 times – a feat that would have been impossible to achieve with the technology available at the time. Subsequent articles in the series built upon this foundation, providing increasingly elaborate descriptions of the supposed discoveries made by Herschel and his team. The stories painted a picture of a lunar landscape teeming with life, featuring vast forests, expansive plains, and shimmering bodies of water. The most captivating aspects of the hoax, however, were the descriptions of the various creatures that allegedly inhabited the Moon. Locke's vivid prose brought to life a menagerie of lunar animals, including unicorns, horned bears, miniature reindeer, and a species of goat-like creatures that roamed the hills and crags of the Moon. However, it was the mention of intelligent life on the Moon that truly captured the public's imagination. The articles described a race of bat-like humanoids, which Locke termed "Vespertilio-homo," living in temples made of sapphire and communicating through a form of spoken language. These creatures were said to have human-like faces, yellowish skin, and membranous wings, and their description was so detailed that many readers believed them to be real. The impact of the Great Moon Hoax was immediate and far-reaching. The New York Sun's circulation skyrocketed from around 8,000 to over 19,000 copies per day as readers clamored for more information about the incredible lunar discoveries. The stories were reprinted in newspapers across the United States and even reached readers in Europe, spreading the hoax's influence far beyond the confines of New York City. Several factors contributed to the success of the Great Moon Hoax. First and foremost was the public's limited scientific knowledge at the time. In an era when formal science education was not widespread, many readers lacked the background to critically evaluate the plausibility of Locke's claims. Additionally, the 19th century was a time of great fascination with astronomical discoveries, as advances in telescope technology were opening up new frontiers in the exploration of the cosmos. The idea that life might exist on other worlds was a topic of intense speculation, and Locke's hoax played into this broader cultural context. Another key factor in the hoax's success was the credibility lent to the stories by invoking the name of Sir John Herschel. Herschel was a highly respected astronomer, and his supposed involvement in the lunar discoveries gave the articles an air of legitimacy. Locke also made clever use of scientific jargon and technical descriptions, which helped to create the illusion of authenticity and made the stories more convincing to the average reader. As the Great Moon Hoax gained traction, however, skeptical voices began to emerge. Some readers, particularly those with a scientific background, questioned the plausibility of the claims and pointed out inconsistencies in the articles. Rival newspapers, jealous of the New York Sun's success, also began to cast doubt on the authenticity of the lunar discoveries. The Journal of Commerce, a competing New York newspaper, published a rebuttal to the hoax, highlighting the scientific impossibilities and ...
Show more
Show less
Apr 2 202416 mins