Ben from 'Push Pull Health' returns to the podcast after two years, complete with booing, to help Sarah and Sean review Final Destination 3 (2006).

Discussion Points:

-Sarah feels this film is a return to form after Final Destination 2 (2003).

-The solid opener with the rollercoaster crash.

-Ben thinks the characters are "awful" and "stink".

-The shocking amount of times Wendy gets her face spattered with blood.

-Little Timmy from Final Destination 2.

-The return of the memorial service.

-Sean thinks there were too many 'splatty' deaths.

-Sarah, Sean and Ben wonder how the series managed to stay fresh.

Raised Questions:

-Has Sean sold out?

-Is Ben worth the wait?

-Why didn't Ben feel as nostalgic about this film as he thought he would?

-Are we meant to care about these characters?

-How long is the duration of the premonition?

-Would you prefer Sarah to calmly tell you that she's had a premonition?

-How many times does the word 'derailed' get used?

-Was it a good idea to go with a primarily all-teenage cast again?

-Were you rooting for Wendy?

-How many baby wipes is Wendy using?

-What's with that gym?

Time Stamps:

0:08- Welcome to Review It Yourself

0:49- The Return of Ben

2:02- Final Destination 3 Discussion

3:53- Tanning Booth Death

6:55- The Characters and Their Fates

9:56- Deaths and CGI Effects

15:51- The Roller Coaster Incident

17:55- The Gym Scene

22:24- Memorial Service Chaos

26:50- The Next Fatalities

28:55- The Train Disaster

36:09- Exploring the Deaths

37:59- The Final Train Scene

40:10- Reflections on the Franchise

40:30- Anticipating Future Instalments

48:28- The Podcast Journey

51:17- The Future of Horror Films

55:14- Wrapping Up the Discussion

1:05:32- Closing Remarks and Thanks

Thanks for Listening!

Find us here:

X: @YourselfReview

Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Thomas Lynskey, actor, writer, and director of The Last Signals joins Sean to discuss the story behind the making of his independent film.

The film explores the actions Titanic’s wireless operators, Senior Operator John ‘Jack’ Phillips and Junior Operator Harold Bride, throughout Titanic's voyage.

The story of the making of the film is as amazing as the film itself, as Tom describes how his family and friends worked to bring the film to life!

My Guest:

The Last Signals is available on Tom's YouTube Channel 'Part Time Explorer': https://www.youtube.com/@PartTimeExplorer

Discussion Points:

-The incredible collaborative effort it took to build the sets, assemble the cast, and scout the locations over two years!

-The inspiration behind the film, the 'geeks' of 1912, the wireless operators, and why Tom didn't originally plan to star in the film.

-The length Tom and the cast went to, to achieve historical accuracy.

Raised Questions:

-Do limited resources create the need for creative film-making?

-Where did the inspiration for the film come from?

-How did the cast end up filming from 2am-4am in a Titanic museum?

-Will the footage of Tom's Dad as Senator Smith ever be released?

-Was there a culture of defending fellow White Star crewmen who died during the disaster?

-What can you do to make your parent's pool look like the North Atlantic on screen?

Massive Thanks to Marv from 'Pods Like Us' and Ryan Walker from 'The Walk The Line Podcast' for their advice about interview podcast episodes. Go check out their awesome podcasts!

Time Stamps:

0:05-Welcome to Review It Yourself

4:01-The Last Signals Overview

9:13-Filming Challenges and Set Design

15:10-The Story Behind the Characters

23:10-Accents and Performances

31:57-Exploring Historical Accuracy

40:54-The Impact of the Collision

47:14-The Fate of the Wireless Operators

51:30-Current Projects and Future Endeavours

57:57-Closing Thoughts and Reflections

Thanks for Listening!

Find us here:

X: @YourselfReview

Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sarah continues her first-time viewing of the Final Destination series, with Final Destination 2 (2003).

Discussion Points:

-The tonal shift from the first film to it's sequel.

-The truck with the log that haunts a generation.

-Changing the formula of death's design.

-Sarah discusses her love of kitchen-based deaths in films.

-TANGENT: Sean and Sarah discuss Chinese food.

-Sarah is not happy with how Kimberley treats Clear Rivers!

-The actor who plays Officer Burke is 5 years older than the actress who plays Kimberley.

-"Right. NO. I'm going to stop you there!"-Sarah vehemently disagrees with Sean about Eugene's reaction.

Raised Questions:

-Does the tonal shift guarantee the film series longevity?

-What did Sarah think of the film?

Where's the memorial service?

-How old is Tim supposed to be?

-Do you find the character dynamics refreshing?

-Did you notice the sigh is missing?

Coming Soon:

-Final Destination 3 (2006).

-The Final Destination (2009).

-Final Destination 5 (2011).

Thanks for Listening!

Find us here:

X: @YourselfReview

Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sarah had never seen a single Final Destination film. Sean cleared the schedule to get these reviews done.

Sarah will get her own back soon with 'Sarah decides'.

Will Sarah remain unimpressed by Sean's choice of film?

Discussion Points:

-Sean nearly gets killed by a bookcase.

-Sarah was surprised by how good this film was.

-The origin of the film's premise.

-Sean tries not to spoil any of the upcoming sequels for Sarah.

-How well-written the characters are in this film.

-Sean apologises for his use of the word 're-writed'.

-The brilliant practical effects.

-Sarah enjoyed the lingering deaths, as opposed to the 'blink and miss it' deaths seen in Alien Romulus.

-The depiction of survivors guilt.

-Sarah talks about looking into a bus driver's eyes.

Raised Questions:

-Where's the Woo-Woo Sarah?

-Should you set off Party Poppers during a podcast episode?

-Do you enjoy teen-focused horror films?

-Does this film feel like an extended, early season episode of Buffy for you?

-Does death have a design for us all?

-How did this avoid being another sh*tty teen-angst horror film?

-Did the Final Destination series ever drop the ball?

*-James Wan did the Saw films, not James Wong.

Coming Soon:

-Final Destination 2 (2003).

-Final Destination 3 (2006).

-The Final Destination (2009).

-Final Destination 5 (2011).

Thanks for Listening!

Find us here:

X: @YourselfReview

Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This is a grim one, but it's a film you need to see!

A British kitchen sink drama set in Sheffield in 1983, which follows a young couple expecting their first child before a nuclear war interrupts their plans.

Sean and Sarah review one of the most-unflinching and best British TV films of all time.

Will they remain unimpressed by their choice of film?

Warning: This podcast episodes contains descriptions of some of the shocking events in the film.

Discussion Points:

-Sarah and Sean forgot how bleak this film is.

-How timely this film feels in 2024, even though it was made in 1984.

-The impact of this film when it was first released.

-How unnerving this film is.

-Sean wonders whether they should have chosen this film.

-The British Soap Creme-de-le-creme of actors.

-Just how much the British underestimated the impact of a nuclear bomb.

-Sarah debuts her Northern impression.

-Sarah discusses the power of background events bubbling over so "abruptly and quickly", describing it as "masterful" and "amazing".

-Sarah describes the power of the small character moments, which make the film so special.

-The effects on the post-war generation and the complete lack of social cohesion is highlighted by Sarah.

-Sean wonders if humans would become functionally extinct; when a species reaches such a low level of members that it will inevitably become extinct, as it is unable to replenish it's numbers.

Raised Questions:

-Will this film change the trajectory of your day?

-How bad is Sean's Sheffield accent?

-Is there anything better than an upper class English voice heralding your doom?

-Does watching this film make you extra British?

-Why did they show Threads (1984) to school children?

-Does this film make you want to stop making jokes?

-Was this film the death knell for many high street shops?

-Did they need to make it seem survivable?

-It's not good when they quietly store away the paintings is it?

-Is this the best thing that the BBC has ever made?

Thanks for Listening!

Get in touch:

We would love to hear your thoughts on Threads (1984). Let us know what you thought of the film and our podcast review!

Find us here:

Twitter: @YourselfReview

Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Randy and Steve return to continue the Rush Hour reviews with Rush Hour 2 (2001).

Watch your egg rolls, we're going in!

Discussion Points:

-Sean's notes are abysmal again.

-The lack of seriousness in this film.

-Chris Tucker's dancing.

-The reason Jackie Chan doesn't like the way he speaks in English in this film.

-A brief history of '7 11' shops (Not Sponsored).

-Behind the biggest mouth in the West is a damn good cop with Tucker.

-Steve thinks this film is better than the original film.

Raised Questions:

-Does this film start straight after Rush Hour?

-The most obvious bomb-planting scene ever?

-What is the British version of a '7 11'?

-Where did they park the SS Minnow Johnson?

-How has Randy never seen The Terminator (1984)?

The impressions of Chris Tucker, Jackie Chan, Owen Wilson, Christopher Walken and President Donald Trump (You weren't expecting him were you!) are purely imitations of the performances in the film, or in real life, and not said with any malicious intent and no offence is meant.

The impressions of President Donald Trump are not any remark about American Politics, this is a English podcast, we're not interested.

Thanks for Listening!

Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!

Find us here:

Twitter: @YourselfReview

Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Luke from 'The Nerdstalgic Podcast' returns to join Sean and discuss the Disney-Pixar short film, Float (2019).

Float is a short six-minute film which highlights the importance of difference and acceptance, by following a Father coming to terms with his young son, who 'floats'.

Chapters:

0:00-Welcome and Introduction of this Week's Guest.

25:51-The Power of Acceptance.

45:07-The Impact of Representation.

50:20-Closing Thoughts and Recommendations.

Thanks for Listening!

Find us here:

X: @YourselfReview

Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jackson from 'History with Jackson' joins Sean to discuss one of his favourite films:

Jojo Rabbit (2019).

Jackson and Sean use the film as a framework to delve into the world of Nazi Germany, totalitarian regimes and how this film stays funny and effective, whilst dealing with such a grim subject matter.

Guest: https://historywithjackson.co.uk/

Discussion Points:

-The unique and weird tone of the film.

-Jackson and Sean discuss some of the criticism aimed at the film.

-The power of humour.

-Sean compares the films opening to Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (1997).

-Sean and Jackson dive into totalitarian regimes, indoctrination and the cult of personalities.

-Taika Watiti's portrayal of Adolf Hitler.

-The lasting memory of Occupation.

-The role of women in Nazi Germany.

-The strong performances and dialogue of Jojo Rabbit.

-The power of 'doing what we can' and the power of love.

Raised Questions:

-Do overwhelming positive reviews put you off seeing a film?

-How do you tackle such a depressing and serious subject?

-Is this film a good place to introduce this subject to new generations?

-Does a good cast guarantee a good film?

-Which line did Sean really not like?

-Why didn't Nazi Germany collapse sooner?

-Did you expect an Augustus Gloop impression in this review?

-How is this film THIS funny, given the subject matter?

-Has the term 'Nazi' been diluted and devalued?

Thanks for Listening!

Find us here:

X: @YourselfReview

Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.