Ethics Untangled

By: Jim Baxter
  • Summary

  • Ethics Untangled is a series of conversations about the ethical issues that affect all of us, with academics who have spent some time thinking about them. It is brought to you by the IDEA Centre, a specialist unit for teaching, research, training and consultancy in Applied Ethics at the University of Leeds.

    Find out more about IDEA, including our Masters programmes in Healthcare Ethics and Applied and Professional Ethics, our PhDs and our consultancy services, here:

    ahc.leeds.ac.uk/ethics

    Ethics Untangled is edited by Mark Smith at Leeds Media Services.
    Music is by Kate Wood.

    © 2024 Ethics Untangled
    Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2
Episodes
  • 25. Should lawyers be fighting for a cause? With Alex Batesmith
    Oct 7 2024

    Alex Batesmith has had a fascinating career. After beginning as a criminal barrister in Leeds, he went on to work as a United Nations prosecutor in Cambodia and Kosovo, working on cases involving genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. He's now a legal scholar working at Leeds University, and has been researching the values and motivations of international criminal lawyers. In this conversation we discussed the idea of 'cause lawyering'. Cause lawyers are lawyers who practice law primarily because of their moral, political or ideological commitments. An example of someone who has arguably been a cause lawyer is the UK's new Prime Minister Kier Starmer, whose previous career as a human rights lawyer appears to have been motivated at least partly by some broader moral commitments, including opposition to the death penalty for example. It's interesting to consider how this outlook complicates the ethical framework under which lawyers operate, which traditionally balances duties to the client with duties to the court, and to the rule of law.

    Alex has published an article on the same topic in the Journal of International Criminal Justice, which can be accessed here:

    He also recommended this article by Anna-Maria Marshall and Daniel Crocker Hale.


    Ethics Untangled is produced by IDEA, The Ethics Centre at the University of Leeds.

    Twitter/X: @EthicsUntangled
    Bluesky: @ethicsuntangled.bsky.social
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ideacetl
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idea-ethics-centre/

    Show more Show less
    48 mins
  • 24. Is Your Gender Like Your Name? With Graham Bex-Priestley
    Sep 16 2024

    Gender is, of course, one of the most contentious ethical and political topics you can find at the moment. There are numerous practical and policy debates - for example those relating to medicine, prisons and sport - which can seem completely intractable, and which provoke the strongest possible opinions on all sides.

    Sitting behind these practical questions, however, is a cluster of theoretical questions, which can be summarised as questions about what gender actually is. Graham Bex-Priestley, a Lecturer at the IDEA Centre, has a novel approach to these questions. He suggests that we should think of someone's gender as being something like their name. In this interview, he explains why.

    Graham's article on this topic is here:

    Bex-Priestley, Graham. “Gender as Name.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 23, no. 2 (November 2022): 189–213.

    And here are some articles defending the other views mentioned in the conversation:

    Biological view: Byrne, Alex. “Are Women Adult Human Females?” Philosophical Studies 177, no. 12 (December 2020): 3783–803.

    Family resemblance view: Heyes, Cressida. Line Drawings: Defining Women through Feminist Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000.

    Social position via perceived reproductive role view: Haslanger, Sally. Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Social constraints and enablements view: Ásta. Categories We Live By: The Construction of Sex, Gender, Race, and Other Social Categories. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.

    Critical gender view: Dembroff, Robin. “Beyond Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Gender Kind.” Philosophers’ Imprint 20, no. 9 (April 2020): 1–31. Note the “critical gender” view is about rejecting and destabilising dominant gender ideology and is not to be confused with the “gender critical” movement, which accepts the biological view.

    Existential self-identity view: Bettcher, Talia Mae. “Trans Identities and First-Person Authority.” In You’ve Changed: Sex Reassignment and Personal Identity, edited by Laurie Shrage, 98–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Pluralist view: Jenkins, Katharine. Ontology and Oppression: Race, Gender, and Social Reality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2023. See also Cull, Matthew J. What Gender Should Be. London: Bloomsbury, 2024.

    Performative view: Judith Butler's early books (Gender Trouble, Bodies That Matter) are the classics, but they can be difficult. In contrast, Butler's latest book is written for a public audience: Butler, Judith. Who's Afraid of Gender? Allen Lane, 2024 (many of the topics in this book are discussed in their Cambridge public lecture of the same title).


    Ethics Untangled is produced by IDEA, The Ethics Centre at the University of Leeds.

    Twitter/X: @EthicsUntangled
    Bluesky: @ethicsuntangled.bsky.social
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ideacetl
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idea-ethics-centre/

    Show more Show less
    51 mins
  • 23. What Is Trust? With Christopher McClean
    Sep 2 2024

    Chris McClean is the global lead for digital ethics at Avanade, a large tech innovation and consulting firm. He's also studying for his PhD at the University of Leeds, spending his time thinking about risk and trust relationships, especially in cases with a significant power imbalance, and where the people making the decisions are different from those exposed to the risk resulting from those decisions.

    At the end of this conversation, we explored some practical questions related to Chris's day job, about what trust implies for business and the professions and in the digital realm, but in order to get there we first got stuck into the deeper question of what trust means

    Here's a list of papers and authors mentioned by Chris in the discussion:

    Baier, A. “Trust and Antitrust.” Ethics 96, no. 2 (1986): 231–60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2381376.

    Hawley, K. “Trust, Distrust and Commitment.” Noûs 48, no. 1 (2014): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12000.

    Holton, R. “Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72, no. 1 (March 1994): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409412345881.

    Kirton, A. (2020). Matters of Trust as Matters of Attachment Security. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 28(5), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2020.1802971.

    The most recent Edelman Trust Barometer is here:

    https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2024-02/2024%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20Global%20Report_FINAL.pdf


    Ethics Untangled is produced by the IDEA Ethics Centre at the University of Leeds.

    Twitter: @EthicsUntangled
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ideacetl
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idea-ethics-centre/

    Show more Show less
    34 mins

What listeners say about Ethics Untangled

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.