A Davenport, Iowa police officer shoots dead a 2-year-old Labrador in front of the dog’s family—including the mother, young child, and a young cousin. The officer was never bit, or even so much as scratched, by the dog.

Did the officer simply EXECUTE this poor dog? Could there be ANY legal justification for this officer’s use of deadly force to kill a family pet?

The legal answer, like it or not, is that YES, this shooting of the dog was legally justified.

Anyone not uncontrollably subject to neurotic hysteria regarding this event, and capable of engaging their powers of reason and having a mind open to actual to law, facts, and reasoned analysis, is invited to join me LIVE at 11 AM ET to discuss!

THERE IS ONLY ONE SELF-DEFENSE "INSURANCE" PROVIDER I TRUST!

There are lots of self-defense "insurance" companies out there. Some are hot garbage. Some have limited resources. Some are simply, in my view, untrustworthy. But there is ONE that I PERSONALLY TRUST to protect myself and my family.

LEARN which ONE I TRUST by clicking HERE:

https://lawofselfdefense.com/trust

Get Your FREE Copy of Our Best-Selling Book: "The Law of Self Defense: Principles"

Visit Here: https://lawofselfdefense.com/freebook

Disclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice. If you are in need of legal advice you must retain competent legal counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.