The Anti-Chomsky Reader

De: Peter Collier, David Horowitz

Narrado por: Kirk Jordan

This collection of essays examines Noam Chomsky's controversial ideas about various foreign and domestic issues and even the legitimacy of the linguistics theories on which his reputation rests. It explores the dark corners of what the New Yorker recently called "one of the greatest minds of the 20th century".©2004 Peter Collier; 2004 David Horowitz (P)2007 Blackstone Audio, Inc.

loved it

Absolute must read if you've ever doubted or questioned chomsky or any of his theories.

Outstanding!

Chomsky taken roundly to the wood-shed on multiple fronts. Last chapter is particularly fantastic!

I was appalled to see that the highlighted review showing when I purchased the book, was a negative review by an individual who started by saying that he only listened to the first 15 minutes of the book. Audible, your bias is showing.

Chomsky's tendency and inclination to support his wild opinions by describing things in terms that neither he nor I truly understand like quantum mechanics, etc, leave me with a strong taste of boloney when reading him however unable to formulate a true counter argument.

it has been a real pleasure to hear Chomsky decimated by specialists from the fields in which Chomsky pretends to have knowledge.

My one lament is that like Chomsky himself, the facts will have no effect on the useful idiots who are his adoring fans.

I always had that gut feeling ...

I used to look up to Chomsky through my youth as he was touted in media and on university as one of biggest and most influential intellectual of all time. So I listened with curiosity what he had to say... but there was always that gut feeling that something is off...

15 years later, social discourse started sounding very much like all the Chomsky arguments that I listened back in rebellious years. Then I figured it out, what was off was the way in which he dealt with criticism, how he simply brushed it all aside and continued with his agenda through twisting words and meaning of words.

I was quite stunned to be able to source today problems our society faces to same relativism he was expressing for decades. (well, silly me...)

When you have to deal with adult that self-describes as anarchy-syndicalist you should know from start who you are dealing with. Problem is that media never truly challenged him on his topic where he was... in past 50 years... to say the least controversial, like downplaying Khmer Rouge atrocities, to serve his agenda and personal beliefs.

This book really shattered last piece of credibility that I would have been willing to extend towards Chomsky. Thanks to authors for having courage to write this book, knowing what backlash it could produce against them.

Debunking a Popular Maestro of Hateful Illogicalty

Chomsky is a maestro of illogicality dressed up in a veneer of intellectual sounding verbage. The author of this book does an excellent job of unravelling the illogicality that has done so much to influence youthful minds.

Chomsky is lying through his teeth

It's astounding to what lengths an academic would go to to further his political agenda. The examples provided are convincing. Chomsky and Attenborough are cut from the same cloth.

Discredits Chomsky rather than rebut him

I hoped this book would lay out Chomsky's arguments in good faith and present counterarguments. Unfortunately, it does nothing of the sort. It devastatingly discredits him as an apologist for Cambodia's Khmer Rouge, among other examples that show Chomsky had horrifyingly bad judgement. If he were a candidate for office, this might be a useful exercise in ensuring that someone with such bad judgement isn't elected to a position of authority. But Chomsky is an intellectual. His influence is in his original ideas, not his bankrupt moral authority and despicable associations.

I have never been able to make much sense of Chomsky's arguments. I know Chomsky subscribes to an ideology of anarchism or libertarian-socialism, but that sounded more like a complaint about employer-employee power relationships than a proposal for making a better world. Perhaps the authors are equally mystified by Chomsky, because they merely mock the label libertarian-socialism without defining or discussing it. Perhaps Chomsky does spout pure nonsense, but given that generations of people have found Chomsky insightful, I think it is fair of me to expect of a book about Chomsky would at least explain why his adherents find Chomsky persuasive.

The strongest chapter of the book covers Chomsky's attacks on the "corporate" media. In the context of today's rightwing attacks on the American media, it was interesting to hear a full-throated conservative defense of the American media.

Dishonest writers

They use strawmen all over the place and purposefully misunderstanding and misinterpret Chomsky. This book was a waste of time.

Poor research, biased presentation

Thought the author’s bias was so skewed that it undermined the quality of his argument and made him seem petty.