Republic, Lost: Version 2.0—Part 1: The Flaw

How Money Corrupts Congress—and a Plan to Stop It

By: Lawrence Lessig

Narrated by: Lawrence Lessig

Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Lessig investigates the most vexing problem in American democracy: how money corrupts our nation's politics, and the critical campaign to stop it.

In an era when special interests funnel huge amounts of money into our government—driven by shifts in campaign-finance rules and brought to new levels by the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission—trust in our government has reached an all-time low. More than ever before, Americans believe that money buys results in Congress, and that business interests wield control over our legislature.

With heartfelt urgency and a keen desire for righting wrongs, Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig takes a clear-eyed look at how we arrived at this crisis: how fundamentally good people, with good intentions, have allowed our democracy to be co-opted by outside interests, and how this exploitation has become entrenched in the system. Rejecting simple labels and reductive logic—and instead using examples that resonate as powerfully on the Right as on the Left—Lessig seeks out the root causes of our situation. He plumbs the issues of campaign financing and corporate lobbying, revealing the human faces and follies that have allowed corruption to take such a foothold in our system. He puts the issues in terms that nonwonks can understand, using real-world analogies and real human stories. And ultimately he calls for widespread mobilization and a new Constitutional Convention, presenting achievable solutions for regaining control of our corrupted—but redeemable—representational system. In this way, Lessig plots a roadmap for returning our republic to its intended greatness.

While America may be divided, Lessig vividly champions the idea that we can succeed if we accept that corruption is our common enemy and that we must find a way to fight against it. In Republic Lost, he not only makes this need palpable and clear—he gives us the practical and intellectual tools to do something about it.

PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying PDF will be available in your Audible Library along with the audio.

©2016 Lawrence Lessig (P)2016 Hachette Audio

Critic reviews

As an academic, Lessig has the research chops to find the anecdotes that best fit the narrative case he's making, and to lay them out in wonderful detail. But his real gift is in the art of stringing them together into a story. That means that this book is as persuasive as it is enjoyable to read.—Alesh Houdek, The Atlantic

REPUBLIC, LOST is a powerful reminder that this problem goes deeper than poor legislative tactics or bad character. As progressives contemplate how best to pick up the pieces after recent setbacks, a robust agenda to change how business gets done in the capital needs to be part of the picture. This time, we'd better mean it.—Matthew Yglesias, The American Prospect

History of our government and corruption of it

It took a while to get through, but it was a good book. The ideas put forth are interesting. This book definitely explains why things are so corrupt in U.S.A. The corrupt bribery campaign finance system. how would you even start to fix it? Revoloution somehow? I say that because all of the politicians getting kickbacks would try to stop this correction.

eye opening

get the money it of campaigning, or at least make it very different. Brief, but good book

Interesting Narrative

The book begins by noting that the federal government is locked into inaction by the presence of so many checks on power that it cannot accomplish anything. It promotes the idea that polarization is a root cause, but it fails to consider that the two-party system may be what is at the root of this polarization; instead he tracks down the real problem to be solved which is campaign financing.

The solution is therefore to reform campaign financing somehow. Presumably this is something hat the gridlocked federal government must carry out.

It occurs to me that a more promising possibility would be to reform the way we vote so that the two-party system would be undermined. This would have to happen state by state, but given the gridlocked federal government it might be a better approach. Lessig doe make a short pitch for ranked-choice voting, but there is little reason to think that would end the two-party duopoly; at least the example of Australia suggests otherwise.