Lawless

How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes

De: Leah Litman

Narrado por: Leah Litman

Something is deeply rotten at the Supreme Court. How did we get here and what can we do about it? Crooked Media podcast host Leah Litman shines a light on the unabashed lawlessness embraced by conservative Supreme Court justices and shows us how to fight back.

With the gravitas of Joan Biskupic and the irreverence of Elie Mystal, Leah Litman brings her signature wit to the question of what’s gone wrong at One First Street. In Lawless, she argues that the Supreme Court is no longer practicing law; it’s running on vibes. By “vibes,” Litman means legal-ish claims that repackage the politics of conservative grievance and dress them up in robes. Major decisions adopt the language and posture of the law, while in fact displaying a commitment to protecting a single minority: the religious conservatives and Republican officials whose views are no longer shared by a majority of the country.

Dahlia Lithwick’s Lady Justice meets Rebecca Traister’s Good and Mad as Litman employs pop culture references and the latest decisions to deliver a funny, zeitgeisty, pulls-no-punches cri de coeur undergirded by impeccable scholarship. She gives us the tools we need to understand the law, the dynamics of courts, and the stakes of this current moment—even as she makes us chuckle and emerge empowered to fight for a better future.

PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying PDF will be available in your Audible Library along with the audio.

©2025 Leah Litman (P)2025 Simon & Schuster Audio

She’s the literal best

Professor Litman delivers highly valuable information in a digestible and understandable way. I’m just waiting for the Strict Scrutiny crew to collaborate.

A culturally relevant view into the Supreme Court

This book was somehow both a fun and bleak view into how the Supreme Court became what it is today. Modern cultural references sprinkled throughout combine with historical precedence to make a usually erudite topic digestible. I learned a lot about laws, court cases, and people, from decades past, that continue to affect the United States’ legal system today.

It’s also a case where the book being self-narrated only made the listening experience better.

So digestible, albeit devastating

Thorough, informative, and easy to understand for the legal layperson with easily relatable pop culture references. Everyone should take a listen/read to understand the long-term efforts that have landed us here in The Bad Place.

Unintelligible Narration

The editors should have prevented the author from reading this book. Fast talking, gurgling, mushy, smacking. I don't know how to describe it. Slowing it down to 85% didn't help. I looked forward to this book and even pre-ordered it.