• Stacey Plaskett's Further Reply In Support Of Motion To Dismiss (9/18/24)

  • Sep 18 2024
  • Length: 17 mins
  • Podcast

Stacey Plaskett's Further Reply In Support Of Motion To Dismiss (9/18/24)

Listen for free

View show details

  • Summary

  • In Defendant Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett’s Reply in support of her Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Individual and Class Action Second Amended Complaint (Case 1:23-cv-10301-AS), Congresswoman Plaskett argues that the plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed for failing to meet legal standards required for their case to proceed. She contends that:
    1. The claims are legally insufficient: The plaintiffs have not presented facts that would warrant the continuation of the lawsuit, especially against her in her official capacity.
    2. Qualified immunity: As a government official, Plaskett argues she is protected by qualified immunity, which shields public officials from lawsuits over actions performed within their official duties unless there’s a clear violation of constitutional rights.
    3. Failure to state a claim: The plaintiffs' allegations, even if accepted as true, do not establish a valid legal claim against her.
    4. No personal involvement or wrongdoing: Plaskett denies any direct involvement in the actions alleged by the plaintiffs, arguing that the complaint lacks specific allegations connecting her to any wrongdoing.

    (commercial at 10:34)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.162.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Show more Show less
Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

What listeners say about Stacey Plaskett's Further Reply In Support Of Motion To Dismiss (9/18/24)

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com reviews

Amazon reviews
No Reviews are Available