In today's episode of Crime Time, Inc., we delve into the unique aspects of the Scottish jury system, particularly its controversial 'not proven' verdict. Our hosts discuss the three possible outcomes in a Scottish criminal trial: 'guilty,' 'not guilty,' and 'not proven,' and explore how 'not proven' implies insufficient evidence for conviction while still casting doubt on the accused's innocence. We also examine the historical roots and current applications of the corroboration requirement, which mandates evidence from at least two sources to convict someone. This principle, though aimed at preventing wrongful convictions, has sparked debate due to its complexity and the potential obstacles it poses for prosecution, especially in cases of domestic abuse and sexual assault. The discussion extends to the global context, comparing Scottish legal practices with those of other common law countries, and considers the calls for reform, including the recommendations from the Carloway Review to abolish the corroboration rule. Throughout the episode, our hosts emphasize the importance of understanding the intricacies of the Scottish justice system and the ongoing debate about how best to balance fairness to the accused with justice for victims. Tune in to gain a deeper appreciation of these significant legal issues and their implications for real-life cases.

00:00 Introduction to the Scottish Jury System

00:27 Understanding the Not Proven Verdict

01:17 Historical Roots and Corroboration

04:34 Impact of Corroboration on Trials

09:16 Debate on Corroboration and Not Proven

24:06 Real-Life Implications and Case Examples

27:55 Conclusion and Future of Scottish Justice

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.