The True Crime Tapes

De: Bobby Capucci
Escúchala gratis

  • Resumen


  • The True Crime Tapes pulls you into the shadowy depths of the criminal underworld, where the line between justice and chaos is razor-thin. Each episode dissects the minds of history’s most infamous serial killers, unravels the inner workings of organized crime syndicates, and investigates baffling missing person cases that still haunt the public’s imagination. From the bloody reign of ruthless mob bosses to the chilling patterns of elusive predators, True Crime Time delivers gripping, deeply researched storytelling that leaves no stone unturned.

    With a relentless pursuit of truth, True Crime Time goes beyond the headlines, diving into the psychology, motives, and investigations behind the world’s most shocking crimes. You’ll hear firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and rare archival material that shed new light on cases both well-known and obscure. Whether it’s the brutality of cartel wars, the sinister precision of serial murderers, or the eerie last-known moments of vanished souls, this podcast brings you face-to-face with the darker side of human.

    Every week, True Crime Time takes you on a journey through the twisted corridors of crime, guided by immersive storytelling and chilling attention to detail. Expect heart-pounding narratives, intricate conspiracy threads, and unsettling truths that will leave you questioning everything you thought you knew. If you crave the rush of uncovering the darkest mysteries, brace yourself—because in this world, the truth is often stranger, and far more terrifying, than fiction.
    Copyright Bobby Capucci
    Más Menos
Política y Gobierno
Más Menos
Episodios
  • Diddy Defendants Move To Dismiss The Candice Mccrary Lawsuit With Prejudice (Part 2) (3/16/25)

    Diddy Defendants Move To Dismiss The Candice Mccrary Lawsuit With Prejudice (Part 2) (3/16/25)
    Mar 16 2025
    ​In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV, the defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy") and associated business entities, filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The plaintiff, identified as "Jane Doe," alleges that Combs raped her and threatened her life in 2004. She asserts a claim under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which includes a provision that temporarily revives claims that otherwise would be barred by the statute of limitations.

    The defendants' motion to dismiss likely argues procedural and substantive grounds, such as the expiration of the statute of limitations and potential deficiencies in the plaintiff's allegations. They may also contend that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, possibly challenging the sufficiency of evidence or the applicability of the cited legal provisions. The court's decision on this motion will determine whether the case proceeds to discovery and trial or is dismissed at this preliminary stage.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.57.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Diddy Defendants Move To Dismiss The Candice Mccrary Lawsuit With Prejudice (Part 1) (3/16/25)

    Diddy Defendants Move To Dismiss The Candice Mccrary Lawsuit With Prejudice (Part 1) (3/16/25)
    Mar 16 2025
    ​In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV, the defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy") and associated business entities, filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The plaintiff, identified as "Jane Doe," alleges that Combs raped her and threatened her life in 2004. She asserts a claim under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which includes a provision that temporarily revives claims that otherwise would be barred by the statute of limitations.

    The defendants' motion to dismiss likely argues procedural and substantive grounds, such as the expiration of the statute of limitations and potential deficiencies in the plaintiff's allegations. They may also contend that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, possibly challenging the sufficiency of evidence or the applicability of the cited legal provisions. The court's decision on this motion will determine whether the case proceeds to discovery and trial or is dismissed at this preliminary stage.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.57.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • El Chapo And The Memo Brief For Appeal (Part 5) (3/15/25)

    El Chapo And The Memo Brief For Appeal (Part 5) (3/15/25)
    Mar 16 2025
    Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán is a notorious Mexican drug lord who was once considered one of the most powerful and elusive drug traffickers in the world. Born on April 4, 1957, in La Tuna, Mexico, he rose through the ranks of the Sinaloa Cartel, a powerful drug trafficking organization based in the state of Sinaloa, Mexico.

    El Chapo gained notoriety for his ability to evade capture for many years despite being one of the most wanted men by both Mexican and U.S. authorities. He was known for his cunning tactics, including the use of intricate tunnel systems to transport drugs across the U.S.-Mexico border.

    In 1993, he was arrested in Guatemala and extradited to Mexico, where he was sentenced to 20 years in prison for drug trafficking, criminal association, and bribery charges. However, in 2001, he escaped from prison by reportedly hiding in a laundry cart.

    For over a decade, El Chapo remained on the run, continuing to lead the Sinaloa Cartel and expanding its operations internationally. During this time, he became one of the most powerful and feared drug lords in the world, amassing a vast fortune estimated to be billions of dollars.

    In 2014, he was captured again by Mexican authorities in a joint operation with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in the city of Mazatlán, Mexico. He was subsequently extradited to the United States to face multiple charges related to drug trafficking, money laundering, and organized crime.

    El Chapo's trial in the United States began in November 2018 in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York. The trial was highly publicized and revealed shocking details about his criminal empire, including his involvement in smuggling massive quantities of drugs into the United States and his use of violence and corruption to maintain control.

    In February 2019, after a three-month trial, El Chapo was found guilty on all counts, including operating a continuing criminal enterprise, international distribution of cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs, as well as involvement in multiple murders and money laundering schemes. The verdict ensured that he would likely spend the rest of his life in a maximum-security prison in the United States.

    In this episode we begin our look at why El Chapo Says his trial was unconstitutional and why he deserves a new trial.



    (commercial at 8:49)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Chapo-ca2-brief.pdf (courthousenews.com)
    Más Menos
    12 m

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre The True Crime Tapes

Calificaciones medias de los clientes

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Reseñas de Audible.com

Opiniones de Amazon
No hay comentarios disponibles