• R. v. Ahmadi, 2025 ONCA 219

  • Mar 25 2025
  • Duración: 5 m
  • Podcast

R. v. Ahmadi, 2025 ONCA 219

  • Resumen

  • Fabrication and Guilt: R. v. Ahmadi, 2025 ONCA 219

    🏀 The Full Court Press – Quick Hit

    In this episode, Nate breaks down R. v. Ahmadi, a 2025 decision from the Ontario Court of Appeal, focusing on a key evidentiary issue: when an accused’s out-of-court statements can be used against them.

    The Court draws a sharp line between disbelieving a statement and finding it was fabricated. Only fabricated statements—with independent evidence backing that up—can be used as circumstantial evidence of guilt.

    We talk through how Ahmadi’s ever-changing police interview crossed that line, how the trial judge handled it, and why the ONCA upheld the conviction. A must-know case for anyone running—or challenging—post-offence statements.

    Plus, a lawyer joke to send you off smiling.

    Más Menos
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre R. v. Ahmadi, 2025 ONCA 219

Calificaciones medias de los clientes

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.