Episodios

  • Merkel blows a hole in Washington’s Nord Stream narrative.
    Nov 30 2024
    Merkel blows a hole in Washington’s Nord Stream narrative.The former German chancellor has suggested a suspect and motive for the destruction of the pipeline, saying the not-so-quiet part out loud.Angela Merkel has just dropped a smoking gun into the pages of her new book. According to ‘Freedom: Memoirs 1954-2021’, published on November 26, Berlin was fully aware that Washington wanted to kill off Nord Stream. And that it was just using Russia as a scapegoat to steal a massive new energy market for itself. “The United States argued that its security interests were affected by the building of the pipeline because its ally Germany would make itself too dependent on Russia. In truth, I felt that the United States was mobilizing its formidable economic and financial resources to prevent the business ventures of other countries, even their allies,” Merkel writes.“The United States was chiefly interested in its own economic interests, as it wanted to export to Europe LNG obtained through fracking.” This pretty much establishes that it was by premeditated design that Washington leveraged the Russian military operation in Ukraine as a convenient pretext to turn economic competitor Germany – and the EU more generally – into a vassal. But Merkel’s successor, Chancellor Olaf Scholz, and the rest of the German and European establishment, acted like Joe Biden was just coming to their rescue out of benevolence when he offered to sell them LNG to replace Russian gas – which turned out to cost several times the price, to the ongoing detriment of German and European industry and citizenry.Biden had stood beside Scholz at a White House podium in February 2022, talking like a mafia boss, saying that “there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2” if Russia enters Ukraine. Then the pipeline just mysteriously blew up in September 2022. Germany still hasn’t found those responsible, though.Hey, how about this guy who was standing right next to your chancellor? German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier awarded Biden the Order of Merit in October, citing Germany’s “friendship” with the US, and telling Biden that “under your leadership, the transatlantic alliance is stronger and our partnership is closer than ever.” Yeah, close. Like family. Where you can help yourself to stuff that isn’t yours and wreck it – like an entire German car industry or a pipeline. Or where you can disapprove of a relationship – like the one that Germany had with Russia.Or maybe one can even do both of these things at the same time, like Miami-based American businessman, Stephen Lynch, seems to be attempting to achieve by asking for the US government’s approval in bidding on Nord Stream 2, majority-owned by a subsidiary of Russia’s Gazprom, according to the Wall Street Journal. Now that Washington’s meddling has bankrupted the pipeline project and it’s set for the auction block, guess Lynch figures that maybe he can squeeze in between Russian gas and Germany’s desperation for cheap supply, with Uncle Sam’s blessing.“This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for American and European control over European energy supply for the rest of the fossil-fuel era,” Lynch told the WSJ. It’s also a chance for US interests to profit from, and exert control over, both the EU and Russia, by wedging themselves between the two like they’re a chaperone on a teenage movie date. “I haven’t heard of Gazprom wanting to put gas transportation infrastructure in the hands of the USA,” the Kremlin has said, putting a damper on Lynch’s ambitions, which are perfectly aligned with what Merkel now says has been America’s objective all along.All these leads and Germany still hasn’t been able to nail the bad guys. Meanwhile, its official narrative continues to unravel. Just this week, Poland’s RMF FM News reported that researchers from the Military University of Technology in Warsaw found traces in water samples near the Nord Stream explosion site of TNT – trinitrotoluene – which is found in highly regulated military-grade explosives. Not exactly the kind of stuff that any random dude can just pick up at the local party store down the street along with other supplies for their big Friday night brewski bonanza.Poland has long given major side-eye to the official Western narrative as it’s been dripping out, notably into the German and American press. As their story goes, a bunch of rogue Ukrainian army types just decided after getting hammered together one night in a pub to go play Aquaman in the Baltic Sea and trash Nord Stream all on their own like it was their ex’s new boyfriend’s car. Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky and the CIA tried to stop them when they found out about the plans, but Zelensky’s top general, Valery Zaluzhny, just ignored them… and was then rewarded for doing so with an ambassadorship to Britain.So where would these Ukrainian dudes have scored the military grade TNT? ...
    Más Menos
    7 m
  • Trump to push for Ukraine ceasefire before talks – CNN.
    Nov 28 2024
    Trump to push for Ukraine ceasefire before talks – CNN.
    Moscow and Kiev have both set conditions for negotiations that require major concessions from the other side.
    US President-elect Donald Trump will likely try to bring about a ceasefire in the Ukraine conflict before attempting to push Moscow and Kiev to the negotiating table, CNN reported on Wednesday, citing anonymous sources.
    The Republican claimed on the campaign trail that he could end hostilities between Russia and Ukraine within 24 hours if reelected to the White House. People in Trump’s orbit have put forward competing ideas, which are being reviewed by Mike Waltz, the president-elect’s pick for national security adviser, according to CNN.
    The discussions are still at an early stage, two sources familiar with the issue told the network. Few advocate Ukrainian membership of NATO, the report said.
    There is a wide gap between the conditions that officials in Russia and Ukraine have respectively outlined for a diplomatic engagement.
    Andrey Yermak, the powerful chief-of-staff of Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, this week told the Swedish outlet Dagens industri that a return to the pre-2022 situation would be “a starting point” for talks. The remark apparently backtracks on Kiev’s previous demand for full control over the territory to which it lays claim, including Crimea, before any negotiations could happen.
    Before Kiev launched an incursion into Russia’s Kursk Region in August, Russian President Vladimir Putin pledged to order a ceasefire as soon as Ukraine drops its ambition to join NATO and withdraws its troops from former Ukrainian regions which have joined Russia.
    The proposal has now been withdrawn, and according to Moscow, no talks can happen as long as there is a Ukrainian presence in Kursk Region. Kiev wants to hold on to the seized land to use it as a bargaining chip.
    Several Trump allies have outlined how they believe the conflict could be resolved. Keith Kellogg, Trump's pick to be special envoy on the Ukraine conflict, wants to freeze military combat and suspend Kiev’s bid for NATO membership. Richard Grenell, Trump’s former ambassador to Germany, who was also considered for national security adviser, has urged the creation of “autonomous zones” as part of a settlement.
    Russian forces have been rapidly gaining ground on the front line in recent months. Some Ukrainian military officials have warned that Kiev’s forces are on the verge of collapse.



    Más Menos
    3 m
  • NATO admiral urges businesses to prepare for ‘wartime scenario’.
    Nov 26 2024
    NATO admiral urges businesses to prepare for ‘wartime scenario’.
    Western economies have grown too dependent on Russia and China, and could be blackmailed in the event of war, Rob Bauer claims.
    Businesses in NATO countries should prepare themselves for a “wartime scenario” and adjust their production lines and supply chains to be less vulnerable to blackmail by nations such as Russia and China, the outgoing chief of the US-led bloc’s military committee, Admiral Rob Bauer, said on Monday.
    Speaking at a European Policy Center think-tank event in Brussels, he urged Western industries and businesses to implement deterrence measures.
    “If we
    can make sure that all crucial services and goods can be delivered no matter what, then that is a key part of our deterrence,” Bauer argued.
    “Businesses need to be prepared for a wartime scenario and adjust their production and distribution lines accordingly. Because while it may be the military who wins battles, it’s the economies that win wars,” the NATO official said. He mentioned China and Russia in the context of how he believes wars are waged in the economic sphere.
    “We thought we had a deal with Gazprom, but we actually had a deal with [Russian President Vladimir] Putin,” he stated, apparently referring to the drop in Russian gas supplies to the EU, which took place after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022.
    At the time, the EU declared that ending its reliance on Russian energy was a key priority, and many members voluntarily halted their imports, while supplies also plunged due to the sabotage of Russia’s Nord Stream pipelines.
    American Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh blamed the sabotage on the CIA, alleging that the agency had carried out the attack under the direct orders of the White House – an allegation it has denied.
    Bauer then extended his warning to China, claiming that Beijing could use its exports to NATO states and the infrastructure that it owns in Europe as leverage in the event of a conflict.
    “We are naive if we think the [Chinese] Communist Party will never use that power. Business leaders in Europe and America need to realize that the commercial decisions they make have strategic consequences for the security of their nation,” the official claimed.
    It is unclear what “wartime” Bauer is predicting in his statements.
    NATO has long declared Russia to be a direct threat, and Western officials have repeatedly claimed that if Moscow is allowed to win the conflict in Ukraine, it could then attack other European countries.
    Russia has dismissed these claims as nonsense. Restrictions that Moscow introduced in trade with the West have largely come in response to unprecedented economic sanctions placed on the country in connection with the Ukraine conflict.
    Beijing has also faced its share of trade barriers and restrictions introduced by Western states, and introduced similar measures in response. According to most experts, including many in the West, the sanctions policy has backfired on Western economies, leading to supply shortages and inflation.


    Más Menos
    3 m
  • State corruption may leave Ukrainians freezing – Sunday Times.
    Nov 25 2024
    State corruption may leave Ukrainians freezing – Sunday Times.
    The government reportedly withheld funding for an international project designed to protect the country’s grid.
    Ukrainians could be facing a “deadly winter freeze” because corruption in the government has stalled work on protecting the country’s electricity substations from airstrikes, the Sunday Times has reported.
    The Ukrainian leadership previously accused Russia of destroying 80% of the country’s energy infrastructure. Moscow has stated that it only targets facilities that supply defense manufacturing.
    An official, who oversaw a project in which an international team of engineers developed and tested concrete structures that would protect Ukraine’s energy grid from Russian strikes, resigned in June from the State Agency for Restoration and Infrastructure Development, claiming that Kiev was creating artificial obstacles for his agency’s operations.
    Mustafa Nayyem’s team suspects that the construction of the bunkers was delayed because bribes were not paid to officials in the prime minister’s office, according to the newspaper.
    Nine months since the project was completed Vladimir Zelensky’s government has not delivered the bunkers, the outlet wrote on Saturday, citing sources. Russia
    The work, involving British, American, German, and Japanese experts, was reportedly finished in February, with the estimated cost of the project standing at €1.4 billion ($1.47 billion).
    The outlet also quoted contractors as saying that the necessary funding has not been provided and that the structures are far from complete.
    The bunkers would have provided “third-level protection” for the electricity substations. Ukraine’s energy system is currently relying on British-supplied gabion baskets, or rock-filled cages, and on large concrete protective arches above ground as “first” and “second level protection.”
    Ukrainians must prepare for a winter that will be more difficult than the last, Energy Minister German Galushchenko warned in August.
    The following month, Zelensky claimed that Russia destroyed 80% of Ukraine’s energy infrastructure. He made the statement while seeking the West’s permission to use missiles provided by Kiev’s allies for long-range strikes into Russia.
    Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier said that strikes on Ukraine’s energy facilities are in retaliation for similar attacks from Kiev. In April, Putin also stated that Russia targets Ukraine’s energy infrastructure to “demilitarize” the country, as the strikes affect its defense-industrial complex.
    Since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, the EU and US have provided tens of billions of dollars in financial, military, and humanitarian assistance to Kiev, according to official data.
    Government graft has been consistently named by observers as a major problem for Ukraine since it gained independence in the 1990s. Last year, Transparency International ranked it 104th among 180 nations in its corruption perception index.
    Pentagon Inspector General Robert Storch reported earlier this month that “corruption continues to complicate Ukraine’s efforts to achieve its EU and NATO aspirations,” particularly due to multiple scandals in the Defense Ministry.
    Zelensky claimed in July that his government had made progress in tackling the problem.
    Más Menos
    3 m
  • What we know about Russia’s new Oreshnik missile.
    Nov 23 2024
    What we know about Russia’s new Oreshnik missile.RT news breaks down everything known about the new medium-range hypersonic weapon.Russia’s newly unveiled Oreshnik missile has quickly become the focus of major international attention. Announced by President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, this medium-range hypersonic weapon is seen as a significant advancement in the country’s missile capabilities. One that could have far-reaching consequences for both the Ukraine conflict and broader international security. With its apparently unmatched speed and precision, and the prospect of mass production on the immediate horizon, this missile could be a game-changer for Moscow’s military operation. Here’s what we know so far about the Oreshnik and its potential impact.1. A new weapon, not an upgrade.Contrary to some claims, the Oreshnik is not an upgrade of Soviet-era missile systems, according to Putin. Instead, it is a completely new development built on modern Russian technology. The president emphasized that the missile represents the culmination of efforts within “New Russia,” referring to developments after the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991. “It was created on the basis of modern, latest developments,” he stated.2. Hypersonic capabilities and precision.The Oreshnik missile is described as a high-precision, medium-range weapon, with hypersonic speed. Putin clarified that while it is not considered a “strategic” weapon, its capabilities are still formidable. “Due to its striking power, especially with massive, collective use, and even in combination with other high-precision long-range systems, the use of Oreshnik will be comparable in power to strategic weapons,” he said.This missile is designed to fly at speeds of up to Mach 10 (around 7,600 miles/12,200km per hour), which is roughly ten times the speed of sound. The high velocity makes it extremely difficult to intercept using current missile defense systems. “There are no means of counteracting Oreshnik-type complexes in the world,” Putin asserted, explaining that Western missile defense systems, including those deployed in Western Europe, cannot intercept such fast-moving projectiles.3. First combat use and response to Ukraine.The Oreshnik missile was first used in combat on November 21, 2024, when it struck a Ukrainian defense facility in the city of Dnepropetrovsk. The target was the Yuzhmash industrial complex, a key Ukrainian defense site inherited from the USSR that produces missile equipment. Putin justified the strike as a response to Kiev’s use of long-range missiles, like the American ATACMS and British Storm Shadow systems, against Russian territory. “The regional conflict in Ukraine has acquired elements of a global character,” Putin said, highlighting the broader implications of Western involvement.4. Mass production and deployment.Following the successful test and first use of the new weapon, Russia has committed to mass-producing the system. “Serial production of Oreshnik is practically organized,” Putin confirmed, with the missiles slated for inclusion in Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces (RSVS). This suggests that they will become a key part of Russia’s long-term military strategy, with the potential for widespread deployment in the coming months.Putin noted that the missile’s development process was swift and efficient, with domestic technologies ensuring that Moscow has “resolved import substitution issues.” This suggests that Russia has managed to develop the Oreshnik entirely with its own resources, minimizing reliance on foreign components.5. Global impact and strategic significance.The Oreshnik missile has the potential to change the dynamics of the Ukraine conflict. According to General Sergei Karakayev, the head of Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces, the Oreshnik “can hit targets throughout Europe.” This makes the missile not only a powerful weapon in the context of Ukraine but also one that could have wider geopolitical implications if tensions escalate further.While Russia has not explicitly described the missile as a weapon of mass destruction, its precision and destructive power mean that it could be used to target critical infrastructure in enemy states. In Putin’s view, it provides Russia with a technological advantage that currently cannot be matched by any other country.6. International reactions and future developments.The Oreshnik missile has raised alarms in the West. The use of this new weapon, combined with the conflict in Ukraine, has spurred calls to strengthen air defenses. Ukrainian officials have already approached the US to discuss receiving advanced systems, which could include modernized Patriots or even Aegis missile defense platforms. However, there is no evidence to suggest they would be effective against the Oreshnik.
    Más Menos
    5 m
  • ICC issues arrest warrant for Netanyahu.
    Nov 21 2024
    ICC issues arrest warrant for Netanyahu.
    Prosecutors in The Hague are also seeking the detention of Israel’s former defence minister, Yoav Gallant.
    The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague announced on Thursday that it has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity linked to the Gaza conflict.
    Hamas military leader Mohammed Deif has also been named in a warrant for similar charges.
    The court accuses Netanyahu and Gallant of using starvation as a method of warfare, alleging they deliberately deprived Gaza’s civilian population of essential supplies, including food, water, and medicine.
    Prosecutors claim there was “no obvious military necessity” for such actions, which amount to violations of international law.
    Both Israeli politicians could face arrest if they travel to any of the 123 countries that are signatories to the ICC’s Rome Statute.
    The charges are part of a broader ICC investigation that includes alleged crimes by Hamas during its October 7 attacks on Israel.
    Prosecutors have accused Deif, the mastermind of the assault, of murder, torture, and hostage-taking. Israel claims to have killed Deif in an airstrike earlier this year, though Hamas has not confirmed his death.
    The move has sparked an immediate backlash. Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett called the ICC warrants a “mark of shame,” while opposition leader Yair Lapid labeled the decision “a reward for terrorism.”
    The Israeli government has consistently denied committing war crimes and rejects the court’s jurisdiction. The US and Russia – among others – also don’t recognise the ICC.
    Israel has challenged the ICC’s jurisdiction and argued that it was not given the opportunity to investigate the allegations internally. Netanyahu’s government has dismissed the Hague’s actions as politically motivated interference.
    In Washington, incoming Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune has threatened sanctions against the ICC, echoing earlier House-approved legislation. “If the ICC does not reverse this outrageous action, the Senate must act to sanction the court,” Thune said.
    Other Republican lawmakers, including Senator Susan Collins, pledged to support Israel and press for punitive measures against the ICC.
    The ICC prosecutor, Karim Khan, initially requested arrest warrants in May, alleging widespread violations during Israel’s military response to Hamas. The court said its Pre-Trial Chamber found “reasonable grounds” to believe the accused were responsible for crimes against humanity, including persecution and inhumane acts.
    Last year, the ICC issued similar warrants for the detention of both Russian President Vladimir Putin and the country's Children's Rights Commissioner Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova.
    Más Menos
    3 m
  • Russia’s new nuclear doctrine (KEY POINTS).
    Nov 20 2024
    Russia’s new nuclear doctrine (KEY POINTS).
    President Vladimir Putin has approved changes to the Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence.
    Russian President Vladimir Putin has officially signed a new national nuclear doctrine that outlines the scenarios in which Moscow would be authorized to deploy its nuclear arsenal. Here are the key points of the updated document, as stipulated on the Kremlin's website.
    1. State policy on Nuclear Deterrence is defensive by nature, it is aimed at maintaining the nuclear forces potential at the level sufficient for nuclear deterrence, and guarantees protection of national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the State, and deterrence of a potential adversary from aggression against the Russian Federation and/or its allies. In the event of a military conflict, this Policy provides for the prevention of an escalation of military actions and their termination on conditions that are acceptable for the Russian Federation and/or its allies.
    2. The Russian Federation considers nuclear weapons as a means of deterrence, their use being an extreme and compelled measure, and takes all necessary efforts to reduce nuclear threat and prevent aggravation of interstate relations, that could trigger military conflicts, including nuclear ones.
    3. The Russian Federation ensures nuclear deterrence toward a potential adversary, which is understood to mean any individual states or military coalitions (blocs, alliances) which see the Russian Federation as a potential adversary and possess nuclear arms and/or other weapons of mass destruction or conventional forces with a significant combat capability. Nuclear deterrence is also ensured toward any states which provide the territory, airspace, and/or maritime space under their control as well as resources for preparing and conducting an aggression against the Russian Federation.
    4. An aggression of any single state from a military coalition (bloc, alliance) against the Russian Federation and/or its allies will be regarded as an aggression of the coalition (bloc, alliance) as a whole.
    5. An aggression against the Russian Federation and/or its allies of any non-nuclear state with the participation or support of a nuclear state will be regarded as their joint attack.
    6. The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear arms and/or other weapons of mass destruction against itself and/or its allies, as well as in the event of an aggression against the Russian Federation and/or the Republic of Belarus as constituents of the Union State using conventional arms, if such an aggression creates a critical threat for their sovereignty and/or territorial integrity.
    7. The decision to use nuclear weapons is taken by the President of the Russian Federation.
    Más Menos
    3 m
  • Musk reacts to Biden reportedly allowing deep strikes on Russia.
    Nov 17 2024
    Musk reacts to Biden reportedly allowing deep strikes on Russia.
    The billionaire has joined other members of Donald Trump’s circle in condemning the outgoing president’s apparent move.
    SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, a close confidant of US President-elect Donald Trump, has weighed in on President Joe Biden’s apparent decision to officially sanction the use of American missiles on targets deep within Russian territory, agreeing with a post stating “libs love war.”
    With just two months left in office, Biden reportedly gave in to one of Ukraine’s long-standing demands on Sunday afternoon, authorizing Kiev to use its American-provided Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) in strikes on Russia’s Kursk Region. The decision was simultaneously reported by multiple US media outlets.
    Ukraine plans to conduct its first long-range attacks in the coming days, Reuters reported, citing “two US officials and a source familiar with the decision.”
    Biden’s decision marks a significant escalation in the conflict. While Ukraine has possessed ATACMS missiles since April, the US president did not at that time give Kiev permission to use them on internationally recognized Russian territory. To date, they have been used in strikes on Russia’s Crimea, Donetsk, and Lugansk regions, which Washington considers Ukrainian.
    Responding to the news on X, Utah Senator Mike Lee, a Republican, declared that “Libs [liberals] love war,” adding: “war facilitates bigger government.”
    “True,” Musk replied.
    While SpaceX has provided the Ukrainian military with Starlink internet terminals, Musk has long argued that Kiev cannot hope to defeat Russian forces on the battlefield, and that the conflict must end in a negotiated settlement. The tech tycoon endorsed Donald Trump – who has vowed to bring a swift end to the fighting – earlier this summer, and following Trump’s defeat of Vice President Kamala Harris last week, he has emerged as one of the president-elect’s closest advisers.
    Musk is not the only figure in Trump’s orbit to condemn Biden’s decision. Richard Grenell, a close adviser to the president-elect who served as acting director of national intelligence in 2020, accused Biden of “escalating the wars before he leaves office.”
    “The Military Industrial Complex seems to want to make sure they get World War 3 going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives,” Trump’s son, Donald Jr., wrote on X. “Gotta lock in those $Trillions. Life be damned!!! Imbeciles!”
    Trump has vowed to bring the conflict to a speedy conclusion, and is expected to push Moscow and Kiev to agree to peace talks. Musk reportedly joined Trump on a phone call to Vladimir Zelensky last week, speaking directly to the Ukrainian leader at one point, according to reports in the US media.
    Musk has not acknowledged taking part in the call, but wrote on X shortly afterwards that “the senseless killing will end soon. Time is up for the warmonger profiteers.”
    Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly warned that Moscow would view any attacks on Russia’s internationally recognized territory with American-supplied weaponry as NATO entering the conflict directly. Such actions, he has suggested, would have severe repercussions, including retaliation against Western interests.

    Más Menos
    3 m