
Headline: Trump's Hush Money Conviction in Crosshairs as He Battles to Overturn Case in Federal Appeals Court
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Acerca de esta escucha
### Background of the Case
In May 2024, Donald Trump was convicted in New York State Supreme Court on 34 counts of falsifying business records. The conviction stemmed from his efforts to conceal a payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels in exchange for her silence regarding an alleged affair. Despite the conviction, Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in January 2025, just before his second term in office began, meaning he faced no fines, prison time, or other penalties. However, the conviction remains on his record[2][3].
### Appeal to Federal Court
Trump's legal team has been vigorously pursuing a strategy to erase his criminal record. Their latest move involves appealing to a federal appeals court to transfer the state criminal case to federal court. This effort is part of a broader attempt to invoke presidential immunity, arguing that the case involves official conduct and should thus be handled at the federal level.
On June 11, 2025, Trump's lawyers, including Jeff Wall, presented their case before a three-judge panel in a U.S. court of appeals in Manhattan. They argued that a recent Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, issued after Trump's conviction, provides a basis for moving the case to federal court. This move could potentially pave the way for an appeal to the Supreme Court to overturn the conviction entirely[1][2].
### Previous Attempts
This is not the first time Trump's team has attempted to move the case out of state court. Previous efforts were denied by a federal judge, but the team remains persistent in their bid to squash the criminal conviction.
### Legal Scholars' Perspective
Legal scholars are skeptical about the success of this appeal, noting that it is based on a somewhat antiquated law. The argument hinges on the notion that the case involves official conduct, which is a contentious point given the nature of the hush money payment[2].
### Trump's Public Stance
During his sentencing in January, Trump maintained his innocence and expressed his belief that he was treated unfairly. He has continued to vow to appeal the conviction, reflecting his determination to clear his name[2].
In summary, Donald Trump's legal battles are far from over as he navigates the complexities of appealing his hush money case conviction. The ongoing appeal to transfer the case to federal court is a critical step in his strategy to invoke presidential immunity and potentially overturn his conviction. However, the success of this approach remains uncertain, with legal scholars doubting its viability.
Todavía no hay opiniones