Epstein's Empire Of Evil Podcast Por Bobby Capucci arte de portada

Epstein's Empire Of Evil

Epstein's Empire Of Evil

De: Bobby Capucci
Escúchala gratis

Acerca de esta escucha

 You’ve heard the name. You’ve seen the headlines. But the real story of Jeffrey Epstein isn’t just about one man—it’s about an entire empire of abuse, corruption, and power that stretched across the highest levels of government, finance, and celebrity circles. Epstein’s Empire Of Evil is the definitive deep dive into the sinister world Epstein built, the enablers who kept his secrets, and the survivors who are still fighting for justice.

And I should know—I’ve spent over six years uncovering every dark corner of this case. My name is Bobby Capucci, and I’ve dedicated those same six years exposing the truth about Epstein and the powerful figures who enabled him. From on-the-ground investigations at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, where I spoke with insiders, to national appearances on Tucker Carlson, I’ve followed this story farther than most are willing to go.

Through court documents, investigative reports, whistleblower accounts, and exclusive survivor testimonies, I’ll take you step by step through the criminal enterprise that Epstein built—and the people who still want to keep it buried. From his meteoric rise to power and his sweetheart deals with the justice system to the shadowy global web of elites who surrounded him, no stone will be left unturned.

Who helped Epstein build his empire? Who protected him? And who is still pulling the strings? The answers lie in the shadows of Epstein’s Empire Of Evil.

This is the truth they don’t want you to hear. And I’m here to make sure you do.Bobby Capucci Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Judicial Watch Files A Lawsuit Against The DOJ Over The Epstein Files (4/18/25)

    Judicial Watch Files A Lawsuit Against The DOJ Over The Epstein Files (4/18/25)
    Apr 18 2025
    ​Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for allegedly failing to comply with multiple Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests concerning Jeffrey Epstein's associates and clients. The conservative watchdog group submitted four FOIA requests between February and March 2025 to various DOJ components, including the Office of Information Policy, the Criminal Division, the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, and the FBI. These requests sought records related to Epstein's activities and communications involving Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel regarding the handling and potential release of Epstein-related documents. Despite acknowledgments and assigned tracking numbers, Judicial Watch claims the DOJ has failed to provide the requested information or justify any withholdings, prompting the lawsuit filed on April 8, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

    The lawsuit references a February 24, 2025, Fox News report in which Attorney General Bondi stated that Epstein's client list was "sitting on [her] desk." However, a subsequent DOJ document release on February 27, 2025, was criticized for lacking substantive revelations, as it primarily listed already known associates of Epstein. Judicial Watch argues that the DOJ's actions violate FOIA and hinder public transparency regarding Epstein's network. The organization seeks a court order compelling the DOJ to conduct thorough searches for responsive records, produce all non-exempt documents, and provide explanations for any withholdings. Additionally, Judicial Watch requests that the court enjoin the DOJ from further withholding non-exempt records and award attorney's fees and litigation costs incurred due to the DOJ's non-compliance.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    DOJ allegedly violating FOIA over Jeffrey Epstein files
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Judge Rakoff's Opinion And Order In The JP Morgan Lawsuit Brought By The Survivors (Part 7) (4/18/25)

    Judge Rakoff's Opinion And Order In The JP Morgan Lawsuit Brought By The Survivors (Part 7) (4/18/25)
    Apr 18 2025
    Judge Jed Rakoff approved a $290 million settlement between JPMorgan Chase and Jeffrey Epstein's victims, emphasizing that the case sent a strong message to the financial industry about the responsibilities of banking institutions. The settlement, which did not require JPMorgan to admit liability, resolved claims that the bank ignored red flags to maintain Epstein as a client, benefiting from his illegal activities from 1998 to 2013.

    The approval came after a last-minute challenge from 16 state attorneys general who objected to a clause in the settlement that prevented future claims by any "sovereign or government" on behalf of the victims. They argued that this could hinder future cases against sex trafficking perpetrators. However, Rakoff found the settlement terms clear and justified, dismissing the objections.

    The settlement also included a provision for the lawyers to receive 30% of the settlement amount in fees, which the judge deemed fair given the significant recovery for the plaintiffs. This settlement follows a similar case where Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $75 million to settle claims related to Epstein without admitting wrongdoing.

    (commercial at 7:44)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.130.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • Judge Rakoff's Opinion And Order In The JP Morgan Lawsuit Brought By The Survivors (Part 6) (4/17/25)

    Judge Rakoff's Opinion And Order In The JP Morgan Lawsuit Brought By The Survivors (Part 6) (4/17/25)
    Apr 18 2025
    Judge Jed Rakoff approved a $290 million settlement between JPMorgan Chase and Jeffrey Epstein's victims, emphasizing that the case sent a strong message to the financial industry about the responsibilities of banking institutions. The settlement, which did not require JPMorgan to admit liability, resolved claims that the bank ignored red flags to maintain Epstein as a client, benefiting from his illegal activities from 1998 to 2013.

    The approval came after a last-minute challenge from 16 state attorneys general who objected to a clause in the settlement that prevented future claims by any "sovereign or government" on behalf of the victims. They argued that this could hinder future cases against sex trafficking perpetrators. However, Rakoff found the settlement terms clear and justified, dismissing the objections.

    The settlement also included a provision for the lawyers to receive 30% of the settlement amount in fees, which the judge deemed fair given the significant recovery for the plaintiffs. This settlement follows a similar case where Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $75 million to settle claims related to Epstein without admitting wrongdoing.

    (commercial at 7:44)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.130.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Más Menos
    11 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup
Todavía no hay opiniones