-
Episode 7: Watts
- De: Jim Clemente, Kathy Canning-Mello, James Bruce, John Meroney
- Narrado por: Jim Clemente, Kathy Canning-Mello
- Jul 11 2024
- Duración: 36 m
- Podcast
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Episode 7: Watts
-
Resumen
Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Episode 7: Watts
Calificaciones medias de los clientesReseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.
-
Total5 out of 5 stars
-
Ejecución5 out of 5 stars
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars
- Ann
- 03-05-25
Educational
Information from people and programs like this have such good information for us all of us to learn from. Like the Boston Marathon i learned alot about the kind of people that comit these crimes and why and how they think.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña
-
Total3 out of 5 stars
-
Ejecución2 out of 5 stars
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars
- Alicia M.
- 01-23-25
Male Narrator is Pompous and Boisterous
He is so loud. He’s the guy at the party that demands all of the attention. He comes across as very full of himself. In addition to his demonstrative demeanor, he throws around psychiatric diagnoses like marshmallows in lucky charms—incorrectly I will add. Furthermore, I really question a lot of their supposition in regard to motivations of suspects in this series. I know that I probably sound pompous right now myself, these are FBI profilers (still, I’m a licensed professional that specializes in diagnostics and assessment). Now the woman, she’s a lot easier to listen to, and I feel like her assessment skills are better, though she often has to fight to get a word in, she has disagreed with/corrected him at times. I don’t know what either of their background is (educationally speaking), but we shouldn’t throw around diagnoses, especially when representing yourself as a professional, or as an authority on the subject matter. It’s interesting material (I love analyzing the human mind), but I could do without his theatrics.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña
-
Total5 out of 5 stars
-
Ejecución5 out of 5 stars
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars
- Susan gerard
- 10-29-24
Love Jim and Cathy
I love listening to these two talk about their cases. Amazing to hear the behind the scenes narration of the biggest cases in America. These two are awesome !
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña
-
Total2 out of 5 stars
-
Ejecución2 out of 5 stars
-
Historia2 out of 5 stars
- J. Becoming
- 08-01-24
Short on analysis and narrative
I disliked the emotional ranting and insults. Yes, the criminals are awful people. But two minutes ranting out of five is just over the top. It doesn’t leave much space for analysis or describing the unfolding of the crime or its solution. If I wanted loose emotionally charged rants, I can get them in many other places. I expected more dispassionate discussions.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña
-
Total1 out of 5 stars
-
Ejecución1 out of 5 stars
-
Historia1 out of 5 stars
- Amazon Customer
- 02-13-25
Pseudoscience
I believe the title says it all. Just pseudoscience. The hosts are awful as well. Unlistenable.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña