• Episode 392 - The Menendez Brothers Part 2: The Sweater Defence

  • Mar 27 2025
  • Duración: 1 h y 23 m
  • Podcast
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars (2 calificaciones)

Episode 392 - The Menendez Brothers Part 2: The Sweater Defence

  • Resumen

  • Continuing our filmed mega Menendez marathon, in this episode we dive into the sensational details of Lyle and Erik’s trial – where these Beverly Hills bad boys would need to convince the jury, and the world, of their story.

    We break down the explosive courtroom battles, shocking legal twists, and the media circus that turned the case into a spectacle – plus new bombshell revelations that could change everything for the brothers…

    With 2024’s controversial Monsters TV show thrusting the case firmly back into the spotlight – and sparking a surge of renewed Menendez mania online – look no further to make sure you're fully caught up before Erik and Lyle’s long-awaited resentencing hearing this year.

    Video version will be available Thursday 27th March on our YouTube channel

    Exclusive bonus content:

    Wondery - Ad-free & ShortHand

    Patreon - Ad-free & Bonus Episodes

    Follow us on social media:

    YouTube

    TikTok

    Instagram

    Visit our website:

    Website

    Sources available on redhandedpodcast.com

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Más Menos

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Episode 392 - The Menendez Brothers Part 2: The Sweater Defence

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    1
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Ejecución
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    1
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Historia
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    1
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Ordenar por:
Filtrar por:
  • Total
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    4 out of 5 stars

Great Work. Flawed Conclusion.

Great work, but flawed conclusion. The judge limiting the scope of the second trial to help secure a conviction is enough to make everything else moot. It is the prosecutor's job to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge's job isn't moving goalposts when prosecutors fail. The system is meant to keep innocent people out of prison and not to maximize the amount of people who are put into prison. It is better for criminals to get away than for the innocent to be punished. That being said... they are guilty AF 😂

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña