Episodios

  • Kevin Hart Finds Himself In The Ever Growing Diddy Maelstrom
    Jun 17 2025
    Kevin Hart has been actively distancing himself from the controversies surrounding Sean "Diddy" Combs, especially after Diddy's arrest on charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. When asked by reporters about his involvement in hosting some of Diddy's infamous parties, Hart tactfully avoided the topic. During a recent outing, he was pressed with questions about whether he witnessed any of the questionable behavior at these events, such as the notorious "Freak Offs." Hart quickly shut down the inquiries, repeatedly stating, "Wrong person, wrong question," making it clear that he did not want to be associated with the scandal.


    Hart's avoidance of the subject has drawn attention, particularly after a video resurfaced showing him hosting one of Diddy's parties back in 2010. While no allegations have been made against Hart, his reluctance to engage on the matter has sparked speculation among some fans, who wonder if more revelations may emerge. Like other celebrities linked to Diddy, Hart appears keen to steer clear of the ongoing legal troubles surrounding the music mogul.

    (commercial at 8:31)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Kevin Hart is living 'on edge' in the wake of Diddy's sex trafficking probe as he fears being called out over resurfaced videos on his comedy tour | Daily Mail Online
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • Diddy And The November 25th Bond Letter
    Jun 17 2025
    In response to the Court's request during the November 22, 2024, hearing, defendant Sean Combs has submitted a letter addressing the permissible scope of his communications under the Court's order and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23.1. Combs' legal team outlines the types of interactions he is allowed to engage in, ensuring compliance with the Court's directives while upholding his First and Sixth Amendment rights. The letter emphasizes the importance of balancing the need to prevent potential jury tampering or undue influence with Combs' constitutional rights to free speech and a fair trial.


    The submission seeks to clarify the boundaries of acceptable communications, proposing guidelines that would allow Combs to maintain necessary personal and professional interactions without violating legal restrictions. By providing this detailed briefing, Combs' attorneys aim to assist the Court in establishing clear parameters that protect the integrity of the judicial process while respecting the defendant's fundamental rights.

    (commercial at 11:31)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.85.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    20 m
  • Diddy Gets Hit Six More Lawsuits
    Jun 17 2025
    Tony Buzbee, a high-profile attorney, has filed a series of lawsuits on behalf of 120 individuals against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging sexual abuse, exploitation, and trafficking spanning decades. Buzbee detailed that the alleged victims, both male and female, include minors. Some accusations describe grooming under the promise of record deals and instances of abuse at Combs' events, such as his notorious "Freak Off" parties. The lawsuits represent a wide-ranging legal effort to expose and hold Combs accountable for these alleged acts. Diddy’s legal team denies the allegations and claims they are baseless media attacks.


    In this episode, we take a look at the new disturbing allegations.

    (commercial at 10:24)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Diddy accused of molesting 16-year-old boy at celebrity-filled 'white party' | Fox News
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Former Pussycat Doll Kaya Jones Dishes On The Diddy Arrest
    Jun 17 2025
    Kaya Jones, a former member of the Pussycat Dolls, has made several claims regarding Sean "Diddy" Combs and his associates:
    • Pressure to Engage in Sexual Activities: Jones has shared that during her time with the Pussycat Dolls, she felt pressured to engage in sexual relationships with powerful figures in the music industry, including those linked to Combs.
    • Abuse by Combs' Inner Circle: In interviews, she recounted uncomfortable encounters with individuals connected to Combs, suggesting that the environment around him was part of a larger pattern of industry misconduct.
    • Industry-Wide Exploitation: Jones has emphasized that the issues surrounding Combs reflect a broader culture of abuse in the entertainment world. She believes that the recent lawsuits against Combs could lead to meaningful change and accountability in the industry.


    Her comments add to the ongoing conversation about Combs' alleged misconduct and underscore the systemic nature of exploitation within the music business.

    In this episode, we take a look at what she had to say.


    (commercial at 7:35)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Pussycat Dolls star Kaya Jones says the powerful men on Diddy list are the same 'suits' who abused her | Daily Mail Online
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Diddy And The Limp Wristed Apology In the Wake Of The Cassie Video Dropping
    Jun 16 2025
    Whenever one of these famous people finds themselves in hot water, their go to narrative is something like this:

    "I've realized that I have done some things that are bad, but now I'm getting help. I've found God and I'm in therapy."

    Diddy is no exception. In his latest attempt to try and change the narrative, he released a ridiculous apology video where he does everything but apologize to his victims.

    In this episode, we take a look at that apology and at the story overall and see where things currently stand now that the video has hit the public sphere.

    (commercial at 10:34)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs apologizes in a statement for assaulting Cassie Ventura | CNN
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • The War Between Diddy's Legal Team And The Prosecution Over Juror # 6 Heats Up (Part 3) (6/16/25)
    Jun 16 2025
    In United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), the defense objects to the government's motion to strike a juror, arguing that such an action would severely prejudice Mr. Combs. They contend that the juror’s perceived inconsistencies in answering the Court's questions are insufficient grounds for removal, citing Fazio as legal precedent that limits the Court's discretion in such matters. The defense maintains that there is no valid factual basis for the motion to dismiss the juror.

    Additionally, the defense challenges the government's claim that the motion is a good-faith effort to address the juror's integrity. They argue that this motion should be evaluated in the broader context of the case, given the history of the investigation and prosecution. The defense asserts that the government’s action is not a legitimate concern about the juror’s qualifications but rather an attempt to exploit an opportunity to remove a juror, potentially based on racial or strategic motives.














    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.404.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    9 m
  • The War Between Diddy's Legal Team And The Prosecution Over Juror # 6 Heats Up (Part 2) (6/16/25)
    Jun 16 2025
    In United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), the defense objects to the government's motion to strike a juror, arguing that such an action would severely prejudice Mr. Combs. They contend that the juror’s perceived inconsistencies in answering the Court's questions are insufficient grounds for removal, citing Fazio as legal precedent that limits the Court's discretion in such matters. The defense maintains that there is no valid factual basis for the motion to dismiss the juror.

    Additionally, the defense challenges the government's claim that the motion is a good-faith effort to address the juror's integrity. They argue that this motion should be evaluated in the broader context of the case, given the history of the investigation and prosecution. The defense asserts that the government’s action is not a legitimate concern about the juror’s qualifications but rather an attempt to exploit an opportunity to remove a juror, potentially based on racial or strategic motives.














    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.404.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • The War Between Diddy's Legal Team And The Prosecution Over Juror # 6 Heats Up (Part 1) (6/16/25)
    Jun 16 2025
    In United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), the defense objects to the government's motion to strike a juror, arguing that such an action would severely prejudice Mr. Combs. They contend that the juror’s perceived inconsistencies in answering the Court's questions are insufficient grounds for removal, citing Fazio as legal precedent that limits the Court's discretion in such matters. The defense maintains that there is no valid factual basis for the motion to dismiss the juror.

    Additionally, the defense challenges the government's claim that the motion is a good-faith effort to address the juror's integrity. They argue that this motion should be evaluated in the broader context of the case, given the history of the investigation and prosecution. The defense asserts that the government’s action is not a legitimate concern about the juror’s qualifications but rather an attempt to exploit an opportunity to remove a juror, potentially based on racial or strategic motives.














    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.404.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    13 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup