ALEXANDER THE GREAT - 2. THE MACEDONIAN ARMY: The Macedonian Military Renaissance - J. F. C. Fuller

The Generalship of Alexander the Great by J.F.C. Fuller - Chapter 2. THE MACEDONIAN ARMY: The Macedonian Military Renaissance - HQ Full Book.In Chapter 2 of The Generalship of Alexander the Great, J.F.C. Fuller meticulously examines the evolution and organization of the Macedonian army, which served as the foundation for Alexander the Great’s unparalleled military conquests. This chapter, titled "The Macedonian Army," delves into the transformative reforms instituted by Alexander’s father, King Philip II of Macedon, and contrasts them with the Greek military traditions that preceded his reign. Fuller’s analysis highlights how Philip’s innovations created a professional, disciplined, and versatile fighting force that Alexander later wielded with extraordinary skill. The chapter is divided into two subchapters: "Greek Warfare before Philip" and "Philip’s New Model Army." Together, these sections provide a comprehensive understanding of the military context and innovations that enabled Macedon’s rise to dominance. Fuller’s narrative is both scholarly and engaging, blending historical detail with strategic insight. He emphasizes the revolutionary nature of Philip’s military reforms, which not only reshaped Macedonian warfare but also set a new standard for armies across the ancient world. By exploring the limitations of earlier Greek warfare and the ingenuity of Philip’s system, Fuller sets the stage for understanding Alexander’s ability to execute complex campaigns against formidable adversaries like the Persian Empire. The chapter is essential for readers seeking to grasp the structural and tactical underpinnings of Alexander’s success, as it underscores the critical role of the Macedonian army as an instrument of his generalship. Subchapter: Greek Warfare before Philip This subchapter provides a detailed overview of the military practices in Greece prior to Philip II’s reign, setting the context for his reforms. Fuller describes the traditional Greek approach to warfare, which was dominated by the hoplite phalanx—a formation of heavily armored infantrymen equipped with spears and shields. These citizen-soldiers, drawn from the city-states’ middle and upper classes, fought in tight, rectangular formations that relied on collective discipline and frontal assaults. The hoplite system, while effective in certain scenarios, had significant limitations. Battles were typically short, seasonal affairs, constrained by the agricultural calendar and the amateur status of the soldiers. Mobility, cavalry, and combined arms tactics were underdeveloped, as city-states prioritized infantry over other branches. Fuller notes that Greek warfare was often ritualistic, with battles fought on flat terrain to maximize the phalanx’s strengths. Sieges and prolonged campaigns were rare, as city-states lacked the resources and logistical systems for sustained operations. The subchapter also highlights the political fragmentation of Greece, which hindered the development of unified military strategies. Rivalries between city-states like Athens and Sparta led to a lack of cooperation and innovation, leaving Greek armies vulnerable to more adaptable opponents. Fuller’s analysis underscores the stagnation of Greek military thought, which Philip would exploit and overhaul. This section serves as a critical backdrop, illustrating the challenges Philip faced and the revolutionary nature of his subsequent reforms. Subchapter: Philip’s New Model Army In this subchapter, Fuller explores the groundbreaking military reforms introduced by Philip II, which transformed Macedon into a military powerhouse. Philip, recognizing the weaknesses of traditional Greek warfare, created a professional standing army that combined discipline, versatility, and innovative tactics. Fuller details how Philip reorganized the Macedonian infantry into a new type of phalanx, armed with the sarissa—a long pike that gave his soldiers greater reach than the hoplite spear. This allowed the Macedonian phalanx to hold enemies at bay while other units maneuvered, creating a more dynamic battlefield presence. Philip also developed a robust cavalry arm, particularly the elite Companion Cavalry, which became a decisive striking force. Unlike Greek armies, which marginalized cavalry, Philip integrated horsemen into his tactics, using them for flanking and pursuit. Fuller emphasizes the importance of combined arms in Philip’s system, where infantry, cavalry, and light troops (such as archers and slingers) worked in concert. This coordination required rigorous training and a professionalized army, which Philip achieved by maintaining a year-round force rather than relying on seasonal levies. The subchapter also covers Philip’s logistical and organizational innovations. He improved supply lines, enabling sustained campaigns, and introduced engineering units for sieges and fortifications. Fuller highlights Philip’s use of ...