ALEXANDER THE GREAT - 1. THE BACKGROUND: The Rise of Macedonian Power - J. F. C. Fuller

The Generalship of Alexander the Great by J. F. C. Fuller - Chapter 1. THE BACKGROUND: The Rise of Macedonian Power - HQ Full Book.J. F. C. Fuller’s The Generalship of Alexander the Great is a seminal work that meticulously examines the military genius of Alexander III of Macedon, one of history’s most celebrated conquerors. In Chapter 1, titled “The Background,” Fuller sets the stage for Alexander’s meteoric rise by exploring the political, social, and military landscape of Greece and Macedon in the 4th century BCE. This chapter provides a comprehensive foundation for understanding the conditions that shaped Alexander’s world and the legacy he inherited from his father, Philip II. Fuller’s analysis is both scholarly and engaging, weaving together historical events, philosophical influences, and strategic developments to contextualize Alexander’s achievements. Below is a description of this chapter, including short summaries of each subchapter. Overview of Chapter 1: The BackgroundChapter 1 serves as a historical prelude, detailing the fragmented state of Greece, the decline of its city-states, and the rise of Macedon under Philip II. Fuller argues that Alexander’s success was not solely a product of his own brilliance but also the culmination of historical forces and reforms that preceded him. The chapter traces the decay of Greek autonomy, the intellectual currents that sought to unify the Hellenic world, and Philip’s transformative leadership, which laid the groundwork for Alexander’s empire. By examining key events such as the Sacred Wars and the Congress of Corinth, Fuller illustrates how Macedon emerged as a dominant power, setting the stage for Alexander’s conquests. The chapter is rich in historical detail, offering readers a nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics that enabled Alexander’s extraordinary career. Subchapter Descriptions: Decay of the City-States This subchapter explores the decline of the Greek city-states, which had once been the pinnacle of political and cultural achievement. Fuller describes how, by the 4th century BCE, the city-states, including Athens and Sparta, were weakened by incessant warfare, economic instability, and internal strife. The Peloponnesian War (431–404 BCE) had exhausted their resources and fractured their unity, leaving them vulnerable to external influence. Fuller highlights the shift from independent polis governance to a more chaotic landscape where rivalries and alliances destabilized the region. This decay created a power vacuum that Macedon, under Philip II, would exploit, setting the stage for a new era of centralized authority. Reforms of the Philosophers Here, Fuller examines the intellectual responses to Greece’s political fragmentation, focusing on the contributions of philosophers like Plato and Aristotle. These thinkers proposed reforms to address the city-states’ decline, advocating for stronger governance and unity. Plato’s Republic envisioned an ideal state led by philosopher-kings, while Aristotle, who later tutored Alexander, emphasized practical governance and the study of politics. Fuller notes that these philosophical ideas influenced the broader Hellenic world, fostering a desire for a unified Greece capable of resisting external threats, such as Persia. This subchapter underscores the interplay between philosophy and politics, which shaped the ideological context of Alexander’s era. Philip II of Macedon This section introduces Philip II, Alexander’s father, as a pivotal figure in transforming Macedon from a peripheral kingdom into a dominant power. Fuller details Philip’s military and diplomatic innovations, including the creation of the Macedonian phalanx, a highly disciplined infantry formation, and his strategic use of alliances and marriages. Philip’s reforms strengthened Macedon’s economy, military, and political cohesion, enabling him to exert influence over Greece. Fuller portrays Philip as a visionary leader whose ambition to unite Greece under Macedonian hegemony provided Alexander with the tools and opportunities to pursue his conquests. This subchapter emphasizes Philip’s foundational role in Alexander’s success. Amphipolis and the First Sacred War Fuller analyzes Philip’s early expansionist moves, focusing on the capture of Amphipolis (357 BCE) and his involvement in the First Sacred War (356–346 BCE). Amphipolis, a strategically vital city, gave Macedon control over valuable resources and access to the Aegean Sea. The First Sacred War, centered on control of the Delphic Oracle, allowed Philip to intervene in Greek affairs, positioning himself as a defender of religious sanctity. Fuller highlights how these events showcased Philip’s cunning diplomacy and military prowess, consolidating his influence in northern Greece and setting a precedent for Macedonian intervention in Greek conflicts. Isocrates’ Panhellenic Programme This ...