The Metaphysical Club

A Story of Ideas in America

De: Louis Menand

Narrado por: Paul Heitsch

The Metaphysical Club was an informal group that met in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1872, to talk about ideas. Its members included Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., future associate justice of the United States Supreme Court; William James, the father of modern American psychology; and Charles Sanders Peirce, logician, scientist, and the founder of semiotics. The Club was probably in existence for about nine months. No records were kept. The one thing we know that came out of it was an idea - an idea about ideas. This book is the story of that idea.

Holmes, James, and Peirce all believed that ideas are not things "out there" waiting to be discovered but are tools people invent - like knives and forks and microchips - to make their way in the world. They thought that ideas are produced not by individuals, but by groups of individuals - that ideas are social. They do not develop according to some inner logic of their own but are entirely dependent - like germs - on their human carriers and environment. And they thought that the survival of any idea depends not on its immutability but on its adaptability. The Metaphysical Club is written in the spirit of this idea about ideas. It is not a history of philosophy but an absorbing narrative about personalities and social history, a story about America.

©2001 Louis Menand (P)2019 HighBridge, a division of Recorded Books

Amazing book, minor pronunciation problems with names

Pronunciation of “Peirce” and “Du Bois” (especially the latter) was somewhat distracting. Otherwise an amazing book and a fantastic reader.

Cogent neurophilosology

Wha? This was a great story about some of the more interested thinkers of the past century(ies) that influenced us all. To me, it’s the clearest history I’ve read that merges philosophy, logic, science, neurophysiology, cosmology, psychology, politics, law, cultural diversity, and disability (to name just a few) into a cogent and compelling ball of wax one can get one’s mind around…a veritable sense of a bullseye amid the spread of diverse and multi-dimensional facts abducted toward a truth?

Insight and stimulation, if not complete comprehension

At one point in “The Metaphysical Club,” Menand observes that even such luminaries as Ralph Waldo Emerson would read books for any insight and stimulation they might offer, and abandon efforts at complete comprehension. That is the way I had to read this book. It has far too much happening for me to fully comprehend, but I found it delightful to listen to. The ideas are stimulating, the characters are inspiring, and the writing is luminous.

Hands down the best non fiction book I've read

History, philosophy, psychology, sociology. This book has such depth and scope that it demands rereading. Its the one book I would recommend to anyone and everyone.

so significant that it overcomes its flaws

this book is paired with Menand's The Free world, and in some ways is less well written. for example, I don't think we need the extraordinary amount of space given to an explanation of statistical calculation. There are times when I believe that other lines of explanation could be shortened - but none of this should keep potential readers from a work that is so good at explaining the past seen through philosophy, legal reasoning, and the personal experience of the major characters in the book. so it deserves five stars, despite its flaws.

fascinating connections, awesome history story telling…

keeping it close for quick reference!
nice way to stitch in the history and connections between the main characters.

Terrific book, performer mispronounces key names

An exceptional work of scholarship that will open a vast new conception of the history of ideas to the non-philosophers that this accessible book is designed to reach. Paul Heitsch’s performance is spirited too. However, Heitsch mispronounces key names throughout the book: the name Peirce is supposed to be pronounced like ‘purse’; not like ‘pierce’, as Heitsch does. Dilthey is supposed to be pronounced ‘Dil-tie’, not ‘dil-thee’. Considering he is a protagonist of this account, it is mind-numbing to hear the intellectual giant Peirce’s name mispronounced over and over again. You people had one job.

Great story-well crafted and artfully performed

I disliked that the reader mispronounced “Peirce” and “DuBois.” Reader should have investigated more the proper pronunciations prior to the reading.

Excellent

Well researched and well written. Some names are mispronounced (C.S. Peirce, for example). The scholarship was compelling and interesting.

Narrator needs to do his homework

Excellent overall and the performance is marred only by the narrator’s failure to learn the correct pronunciation of individual names. In addition to an incorrect French pronunciation of W. E. B. Du Bois, Charles S. Pierce should be pronounced as “purse.” It's understandable that anglophones typically are awful when reading sections written in a language other than English, but there’s no excuse for not using the proper pronunciation when referring to the central characters in a text.