The Case Against the Supreme Court
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
$0.99/mes por los primeros 3 meses
Exclusivo para miembros Prime: ¿Nuevo en Audible?Obtén 2 audiolibros gratis con tu prueba.
The Case Against the Supreme Court
Compra ahora por $22.50
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Philip Hernandez
Acerca de esta escucha
Both historically and in the present, the Supreme Court has largely been a failure
In this devastating book, Erwin Chemerinsky—“one of the shining lights of legal academia” (The New York Times)—shows how, case by case, for over two centuries, the hallowed Court has been far more likely to uphold government abuses of power than to stop them. Drawing on a wealth of rulings, some famous, others little known, he reviews the Supreme Court’s historic failures in key areas, including the refusal to protect minorities, the upholding of gender discrimination, and the neglect of the Constitution in times of crisis, from World War I through 9/11.
No one is better suited to make this case than Chemerinsky. He has studied, taught, and practiced constitutional law for thirty years and has argued before the Supreme Court. With passion and eloquence, Chemerinsky advocates reforms that could make the system work better, and he challenges us to think more critically about the nature of the Court and the fallible men and women who sit on it.
©2014 Erwin Chemerinsky (P)2023 Penguin AudioLos oyentes también disfrutaron...
-
Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Henning
- Duración: 7 h y 9 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 70
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 59
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 58
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know the "original intent" of any provision.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Impeccably Logical, Backed by 100 Specific Example
- De Amy Eaton en 03-17-23
-
Prequel
- An American Fight Against Fascism
- De: Rachel Maddow
- Narrado por: Rachel Maddow
- Duración: 13 h y 9 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 3,128
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 2,816
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 2,813
Inspired by her research for the hit podcast Ultra, Rachel Maddow charts the rise of a wild American strain of authoritarianism that has been alive on the far-right edge of our politics for the better part of a century. Before and even after our troops had begun fighting abroad in World War II, a clandestine network flooded the country with disinformation aimed at sapping the strength of the U.S. war effort and persuading Americans that our natural alliance was with the Axis, not against it.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
The fight to keep democracy alive
- De Rex en 10-19-23
De: Rachel Maddow
-
Enough
- De: Cassidy Hutchinson
- Narrado por: Cassidy Hutchinson
- Duración: 11 h y 36 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 4,341
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 3,949
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 3,939
Ever since a childhood visit to Washington, DC, Cassidy Hutchinson aspired to serve her country in government. Raised in a working-class family with a military background, she was the first in her immediate family to graduate from college. Despite having no ties to Washington, Hutchinson landed a vital position at the center of the Trump White House.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Painful
- De Melissa C. en 09-28-23
-
The Shadow Docket
- How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine the Republic
- De: Stephen Vladeck
- Narrado por: Jonathan Todd Ross
- Duración: 11 h y 17 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 104
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 86
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 85
The Supreme Court has always had the authority to issue emergency rulings in exceptional circumstances. But since 2017, the Court has dramatically expanded its use of the behind-the-scenes “shadow docket,” regularly making decisions that affect millions of Americans without public hearings and without explanation, through cryptic late-night rulings that leave lawyers—and citizens—scrambling. But Americans of all political stripes should be worried about what the shadow docket portends for the rule of law, argues Supreme Court expert Stephen Vladeck.
-
4 out of 5 stars
-
Where was Vladeck?
- De SorenKMiller en 05-25-23
De: Stephen Vladeck
-
Nine Black Robes
- Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences
- De: Joan Biskupic
- Narrado por: Kirsten Potter
- Duración: 13 h y 11 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 71
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 55
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 54
CNN Senior Supreme Court Analyst Joan Biskupic provides an urgent and inside look at the history-making era in the Supreme Court during the Trump and post-Trump years, from its seismic shift to the Right to its controversial decisions, including its reversal of Roe v. Wade, based on access to all the key players.
-
3 out of 5 stars
-
Another 3 star effort from Biskupic
- De Richard Spitaleri Jr. en 04-16-23
De: Joan Biskupic
-
The Supermajority
- How the Supreme Court Divided America
- De: Michael Waldman
- Narrado por: Robertson Dean, Michael Waldman - introduction
- Duración: 11 h y 15 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 37
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 30
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 30
In The Supermajority, Michael Waldman explores the tumultuous 2021–2022 Supreme Court term. He draws deeply on history to examine other times the Court veered from the popular will, provoking controversy, and backlash. And he analyzes the most important new rulings and their implications for the law and for American society. Waldman asks: What can we do when the Supreme Court challenges the country?
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
This should be a serialized media presentation, for the return of some normalization of the Supreme Court.
- De Elaine en 06-08-23
De: Michael Waldman
-
Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Henning
- Duración: 7 h y 9 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 70
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 59
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 58
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know the "original intent" of any provision.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Impeccably Logical, Backed by 100 Specific Example
- De Amy Eaton en 03-17-23
-
Prequel
- An American Fight Against Fascism
- De: Rachel Maddow
- Narrado por: Rachel Maddow
- Duración: 13 h y 9 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 3,128
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 2,816
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 2,813
Inspired by her research for the hit podcast Ultra, Rachel Maddow charts the rise of a wild American strain of authoritarianism that has been alive on the far-right edge of our politics for the better part of a century. Before and even after our troops had begun fighting abroad in World War II, a clandestine network flooded the country with disinformation aimed at sapping the strength of the U.S. war effort and persuading Americans that our natural alliance was with the Axis, not against it.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
The fight to keep democracy alive
- De Rex en 10-19-23
De: Rachel Maddow
-
Enough
- De: Cassidy Hutchinson
- Narrado por: Cassidy Hutchinson
- Duración: 11 h y 36 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 4,341
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 3,949
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 3,939
Ever since a childhood visit to Washington, DC, Cassidy Hutchinson aspired to serve her country in government. Raised in a working-class family with a military background, she was the first in her immediate family to graduate from college. Despite having no ties to Washington, Hutchinson landed a vital position at the center of the Trump White House.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Painful
- De Melissa C. en 09-28-23
-
The Shadow Docket
- How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine the Republic
- De: Stephen Vladeck
- Narrado por: Jonathan Todd Ross
- Duración: 11 h y 17 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 104
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 86
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 85
The Supreme Court has always had the authority to issue emergency rulings in exceptional circumstances. But since 2017, the Court has dramatically expanded its use of the behind-the-scenes “shadow docket,” regularly making decisions that affect millions of Americans without public hearings and without explanation, through cryptic late-night rulings that leave lawyers—and citizens—scrambling. But Americans of all political stripes should be worried about what the shadow docket portends for the rule of law, argues Supreme Court expert Stephen Vladeck.
-
4 out of 5 stars
-
Where was Vladeck?
- De SorenKMiller en 05-25-23
De: Stephen Vladeck
-
Nine Black Robes
- Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences
- De: Joan Biskupic
- Narrado por: Kirsten Potter
- Duración: 13 h y 11 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 71
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 55
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 54
CNN Senior Supreme Court Analyst Joan Biskupic provides an urgent and inside look at the history-making era in the Supreme Court during the Trump and post-Trump years, from its seismic shift to the Right to its controversial decisions, including its reversal of Roe v. Wade, based on access to all the key players.
-
3 out of 5 stars
-
Another 3 star effort from Biskupic
- De Richard Spitaleri Jr. en 04-16-23
De: Joan Biskupic
-
The Supermajority
- How the Supreme Court Divided America
- De: Michael Waldman
- Narrado por: Robertson Dean, Michael Waldman - introduction
- Duración: 11 h y 15 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 37
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 30
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 30
In The Supermajority, Michael Waldman explores the tumultuous 2021–2022 Supreme Court term. He draws deeply on history to examine other times the Court veered from the popular will, provoking controversy, and backlash. And he analyzes the most important new rulings and their implications for the law and for American society. Waldman asks: What can we do when the Supreme Court challenges the country?
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
This should be a serialized media presentation, for the return of some normalization of the Supreme Court.
- De Elaine en 06-08-23
De: Michael Waldman
-
Presumed Guilty
- How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Perry Daniels
- Duración: 11 h y 45 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 34
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 32
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 32
Presumed Guilty reveals how the Supreme Court allows the perpetuation of racist policing by presuming that suspects, especially people of color, are guilty.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Required Reading
- De Robert Bragaw en 02-26-23
-
We the People
- A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Peter Berkrot
- Duración: 7 h y 53 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 48
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 39
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 39
From gun control to reproductive health, a conservative Supreme Court will reshape the lives of all Americans for decades to come. The time to develop and defend a progressive vision of the US Constitution that protects the rights of all people is now.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Hypocritical evaluation of the constitution
- De surya en 03-23-19
-
Free Speech on Campus
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky, Howard Gillman
- Narrado por: James Edward Thomas
- Duración: 5 h y 36 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 36
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 32
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 32
Can free speech coexist with an inclusive campus environment? Hardly a week goes by without another controversy over free speech on college campuses. On one side, there are increased demands to censor hateful, disrespectful, and bullying expression and to ensure an inclusive and nondiscriminatory learning environment. On the other side are traditional free speech advocates who charge that recent demands for censorship coddle students and threaten free inquiry.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
A must read for understanding the 1st Amendment!
- De Kimberly Finnegan en 12-27-18
De: Erwin Chemerinsky, y otros
-
Romney
- A Reckoning
- De: McKay Coppins
- Narrado por: Jonathan Davis, McKay Coppins
- Duración: 12 h y 31 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 1,047
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 953
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 953
Few figures in American politics have seen more and said less than Mitt Romney. An outspoken dissident in Donald Trump’s GOP, he has made headlines in recent years for standing alone against the forces he believes are poisoning the party he once led. Romney was the first senator in history to vote to remove from office a president of his own party. When that president’s supporters went on to storm the US Capitol, Romney delivered a thundering speech from the Senate floor accusing his fellow Republicans of stoking insurrection.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Political and intellectual biography at its best!
- De Amazon Customer en 10-25-23
De: McKay Coppins
-
The Fall
- The End of Fox News and the Murdoch Dynasty
- De: Michael Wolff
- Narrado por: Michael Wolff - introduction, Holter Graham
- Duración: 10 h y 32 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 97
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 79
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 79
For almost three decades, Fox News has not only made political careers (see: President Donald J. Trump) but also fundamentally altered the political landscape of the United States. It is a truism: as Fox goes, so goes the nation—into further divisiveness and awash in fake news, a gleefully polarizing company. But just as Fox has pushed America apart, now it too is coming apart. As is the family dynasty behind it.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Terrific rundown of Fox
- De Iread en 10-05-23
De: Michael Wolff
-
Tyranny of the Minority
- Why American Democracy Reached the Breaking Point
- De: Steven Levitsky, Daniel Ziblatt
- Narrado por: Fred Sanders
- Duración: 8 h y 49 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 313
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 281
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 281
America is undergoing a massive experiment: It is moving, in fits and starts, toward a multiracial democracy, something few societies have ever done. But the prospect of change has sparked an authoritarian backlash that threatens the very foundations of our political system. Why is democracy under assault here, and not in other wealthy, diversifying nations? And what can we do to save it?
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Tyranny of the Minority
- De orders en 10-07-23
De: Steven Levitsky, y otros
-
The Scheme
- How the Right Wing Used Dark Money to Capture the Supreme Court
- De: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Jennifer Mueller
- Narrado por: Charles Constant
- Duración: 8 h y 1 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 183
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 162
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 162
Following his book Captured on corporate capture of regulatory and government agencies, and his years of experience as a prosecutor, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse here turns his attention to the right-wing scheme to capture the courts, and how it influenced the Trump administration's appointment of over 230 "business-friendly" judges, including the last three justices of the United States Supreme Court.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Dysfunctional democracy explained
- De Mark en 10-25-22
De: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, y otros
-
Blowback
- A Warning to Save Democracy from the Next Trump
- De: Miles Taylor
- Narrado por: Miles Taylor
- Duración: 12 h y 57 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 455
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 405
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 404
Donald Trump will be president again, whether he is on the ballot or not. That is because Trumpism is overtaking the Republican Party and will mount a vigorous comeback, potentially in the hands of a savvier successor. This prophecy will come true, according to Miles Taylor, if we do not learn the lessons of the recent past. With the 2024 election approaching, the formerly “Anonymous” official is back with bombshell revelations and a sobering national forecast. Taylor predicts what could happen inside “Trump 2.0,” the White House of a more competent and more formidable copycat.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
We will only have ourselves to blame if we sink into autocracy
- De MS en 07-23-23
De: Miles Taylor
-
The Conspiracy to End America
- Five Ways My Old Party Is Driving Our Democracy to Autocracy
- De: Stuart Stevens
- Narrado por: Jeff Bottoms
- Duración: 5 h y 53 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 219
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 203
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 203
Today’s Republican party is not a “normal” political party in the American tradition. It has become an autocratic movement masquerading as a political party. As Stuart Stevens argues in The Conspiracy to End America, if we look away from that truth, we greatly increase the likelihood that the America we love will slip away, never to return.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Required Reading
- De Arturo Zendejas en 10-27-23
De: Stuart Stevens
-
Birchers
- How the John Birch Society Radicalized the American Right
- De: Matthew Dallek
- Narrado por: Donald Corren
- Duración: 11 h y 37 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 63
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 56
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 56
At the height of the John Birch Society’s activity in the 1960s, critics dismissed its members as a paranoid fringe. After all, “Birchers” believed that a vast communist conspiracy existed in America and posed an existential threat to Christianity, capitalism, and freedom. But as historian Matthew Dallek reveals, the Birch Society’s extremism remade American conservatism. Most Birchers were white professionals who were radicalized as growing calls for racial and gender equality appeared to upend American life.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Do not recommend
- De Michael F. en 05-21-23
De: Matthew Dallek
-
Lady Justice
- Women, the Law, and the Battle to Save America
- De: Dahlia Lithwick
- Narrado por: Dahlia Lithwick
- Duración: 10 h y 49 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 447
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 400
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 398
In Lady Justice, Dahlia Lithwick, one of the nation’s foremost legal commentators, illuminates these many heroes of the Trump years. From Sally Yates and Becca Heller, who fought the Muslim travel ban, to Roberta Kaplan, who sued the neo-Nazis in Charlottesville, to Stacey Abrams, who worked to protect the voting rights of millions of Georgians, Lithwick dramatizes in thrilling detail the women lawyers who worked tirelessly to hold the line against the most chaotic presidency in living memory.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Beautiful
- De susan c en 09-26-22
De: Dahlia Lithwick
-
The Chevron Doctrine
- Its Rise and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State
- De: Thomas W. Merrill
- Narrado por: Mike Chamberlain
- Duración: 12 h y 41 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 3
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 2
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 2
Since the Supreme Court's 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, this judicial review has been highly deferential: courts must uphold agency interpretations of unclear laws as long as these interpretations are "reasonable." But the Chevron doctrine faces backlash from constitutional scholars and, now, from Supreme Court justices who insist that courts, not administrative agencies, have the authority to say what the law is. Recognizing that Congress cannot help relying on agencies to carry out laws, Merrill rejects the notion of discarding the administrative state.
Relacionado con este tema
-
We the People
- A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Peter Berkrot
- Duración: 7 h y 53 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 48
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 39
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 39
From gun control to reproductive health, a conservative Supreme Court will reshape the lives of all Americans for decades to come. The time to develop and defend a progressive vision of the US Constitution that protects the rights of all people is now.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Hypocritical evaluation of the constitution
- De surya en 03-23-19
-
The Supremes' Greatest Hits, 2nd Revised & Updated Edition
- The 44 Supreme Court Cases That Most Directly Affect Your Life
- De: Michael G. Trachtman
- Narrado por: Jonathan Yen
- Duración: 7 h y 20 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 68
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 53
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 54
The Supreme Court's rulings have shaped American life and justice and allowed Americans to retain basic freedoms such as privacy, free speech, and the right to a fair trial. This revised and updated edition of Michael G. Trachtman's riveting work includes 10 important cases from 2010 to 2015.
-
3 out of 5 stars
-
Nice review overall.
- De "freeindeed4ever" en 02-10-20
-
The Nonsense Factory
- The Making and Breaking of the American Legal System
- De: Bruce Cannon Gibney
- Narrado por: Matt Kugler
- Duración: 17 h y 10 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 43
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 37
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 36
Our trial courts conduct hardly any trials, our correctional systems do not correct, and the rise of mandated arbitration has ushered in a shadowy system of privatized "justice". Meanwhile, our legislators can't even follow their own rules for making rules while the rule of law mutates into a perpetual state of emergency. The legal system is becoming an incomprehensible farce. How did this happen? In The Nonsense Factory, Bruce Cannon Gibney shows that over the past 70 years, the legal system has dangerously confused quantity with quality and might with legitimacy.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Ruined by obvious bias
- De M. E. Blackman en 10-07-19
-
How Rights Went Wrong
- Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart
- De: Jamal Greene
- Narrado por: Ryan Vincent Anderson
- Duración: 11 h y 7 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 80
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 71
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 72
Rights are a sacred part of American identity. Yet they were an afterthought for the Framers. Only as a result of the racial strife that exploded during the Civil War—and a series of resulting missteps by the Supreme Court—did rights gain such outsized power. Over and again, courts have treated rights conflicts as zero-sum games in which awarding rights to one side means denying rights to others. As eminent legal scholar Jamal Greene shows in How Rights Went Wrong, we need to recouple rights with justice—before they tear society apart.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
A different way to look at rights.
- De Nicolas Pabon en 07-11-23
De: Jamal Greene
-
How to Read the Constitution - and Why
- De: Kim Wehle
- Narrado por: Kim Wehle
- Duración: 9 h y 44 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 145
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 130
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 130
The Constitution is the most significant document in America. But do you fully understand what this valuable document means to you? In How to Read the Constitution - and Why, legal expert and educator Kimberly Wehle spells out in clear, simple, and common-sense terms what is in the Constitution and most importantly, what it means. In compelling terms and including text from the United States Constitution, she describes how the Constitution’s protections are eroding.
-
2 out of 5 stars
-
very biased
- De Anonymous User en 01-25-20
De: Kim Wehle
-
Making Our Democracy Work
- A Judge’s View
- De: Justice Stephen Breyer
- Narrado por: Luis Moreno
- Duración: 10 h y 17 m
- Versión completa
-
General4 out of 5 stars 64
-
Narración:4 out of 5 stars 45
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 44
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer delivers an impassioned argument for the proper role of America’s highest judicial body. Examining historic and contemporary decisions by the Court, Breyer highlights the rulings that have bolstered public confidence as well as the missteps that have triggered distrust. What emerges is a unique approach - certain to be admired for years to come - to interpreting the Constitution.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Timely
- De Don en 05-17-17
-
We the People
- A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Peter Berkrot
- Duración: 7 h y 53 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 48
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 39
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 39
From gun control to reproductive health, a conservative Supreme Court will reshape the lives of all Americans for decades to come. The time to develop and defend a progressive vision of the US Constitution that protects the rights of all people is now.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Hypocritical evaluation of the constitution
- De surya en 03-23-19
-
The Supremes' Greatest Hits, 2nd Revised & Updated Edition
- The 44 Supreme Court Cases That Most Directly Affect Your Life
- De: Michael G. Trachtman
- Narrado por: Jonathan Yen
- Duración: 7 h y 20 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 68
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 53
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 54
The Supreme Court's rulings have shaped American life and justice and allowed Americans to retain basic freedoms such as privacy, free speech, and the right to a fair trial. This revised and updated edition of Michael G. Trachtman's riveting work includes 10 important cases from 2010 to 2015.
-
3 out of 5 stars
-
Nice review overall.
- De "freeindeed4ever" en 02-10-20
-
The Nonsense Factory
- The Making and Breaking of the American Legal System
- De: Bruce Cannon Gibney
- Narrado por: Matt Kugler
- Duración: 17 h y 10 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 43
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 37
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 36
Our trial courts conduct hardly any trials, our correctional systems do not correct, and the rise of mandated arbitration has ushered in a shadowy system of privatized "justice". Meanwhile, our legislators can't even follow their own rules for making rules while the rule of law mutates into a perpetual state of emergency. The legal system is becoming an incomprehensible farce. How did this happen? In The Nonsense Factory, Bruce Cannon Gibney shows that over the past 70 years, the legal system has dangerously confused quantity with quality and might with legitimacy.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Ruined by obvious bias
- De M. E. Blackman en 10-07-19
-
How Rights Went Wrong
- Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart
- De: Jamal Greene
- Narrado por: Ryan Vincent Anderson
- Duración: 11 h y 7 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 80
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 71
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 72
Rights are a sacred part of American identity. Yet they were an afterthought for the Framers. Only as a result of the racial strife that exploded during the Civil War—and a series of resulting missteps by the Supreme Court—did rights gain such outsized power. Over and again, courts have treated rights conflicts as zero-sum games in which awarding rights to one side means denying rights to others. As eminent legal scholar Jamal Greene shows in How Rights Went Wrong, we need to recouple rights with justice—before they tear society apart.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
A different way to look at rights.
- De Nicolas Pabon en 07-11-23
De: Jamal Greene
-
How to Read the Constitution - and Why
- De: Kim Wehle
- Narrado por: Kim Wehle
- Duración: 9 h y 44 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 145
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 130
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 130
The Constitution is the most significant document in America. But do you fully understand what this valuable document means to you? In How to Read the Constitution - and Why, legal expert and educator Kimberly Wehle spells out in clear, simple, and common-sense terms what is in the Constitution and most importantly, what it means. In compelling terms and including text from the United States Constitution, she describes how the Constitution’s protections are eroding.
-
2 out of 5 stars
-
very biased
- De Anonymous User en 01-25-20
De: Kim Wehle
-
Making Our Democracy Work
- A Judge’s View
- De: Justice Stephen Breyer
- Narrado por: Luis Moreno
- Duración: 10 h y 17 m
- Versión completa
-
General4 out of 5 stars 64
-
Narración:4 out of 5 stars 45
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 44
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer delivers an impassioned argument for the proper role of America’s highest judicial body. Examining historic and contemporary decisions by the Court, Breyer highlights the rulings that have bolstered public confidence as well as the missteps that have triggered distrust. What emerges is a unique approach - certain to be admired for years to come - to interpreting the Constitution.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Timely
- De Don en 05-17-17
-
Supreme Power
- 7 Pivotal Supreme Court Decisions That Had a Major Impact on America
- De: Ted Stewart
- Narrado por: Art Allen
- Duración: 7 h y 40 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 30
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 28
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 28
Best-selling author Ted Stewart explains how the Supreme Court and its nine appointed members now stand at a crucial point in their power to hand down momentous and far-ranging decisions. Today's Court affects every major area of American life, from health care to civil rights, from abortion to marriage. This fascinating book reveals the complex history of the Court as told through seven pivotal decisions.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Polemical, downright ridiculous at times
- De Joe Igla en 11-04-17
De: Ted Stewart
-
The Constitution Today
- Timeless Lessons for the Issues of Our Era
- De: Akhil Reed Amar
- Narrado por: Mike Chamberlain
- Duración: 19 h y 41 m
- Versión completa
-
General4 out of 5 stars 71
-
Narración:4 out of 5 stars 66
-
Historia4 out of 5 stars 64
When the stories that lead our daily news involve momentous constitutional questions, present-minded journalists and busy citizens cannot always see the stakes clearly. In The Constitution Today, Akhil Reed Amar, America's preeminent constitutional scholar, considers the biggest and most bitterly contested debates of the last two decades. He shows how the Constitution's text, history, and structure are a crucial repository of collective wisdom, providing specific rules and grand themes relevant to every organ of the American body politic.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Amar is a Brilliant Arguer
- De MJ Schirmer en 11-16-16
De: Akhil Reed Amar
-
U.S. Constitution for Dummies
- 2nd Edition
- De: Dr. Michael Arnheim
- Narrado por: Dr. Michael Arnheim
- Duración: 18 h y 40 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 141
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 130
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 127
Want to make sense of the US Constitution? This new edition walks you through this revered document, explaining how the articles and amendments came to be and how they have guided legislators, judges, and presidents - and sparked ongoing debates along the way. You'll get the lowdown on all the big issues - from separation of church and state to impeachment to civil rights - that continue to affect Americans' daily lives. Plus, you'll find out about the different approaches to interpretation and how the document has changed over the past 200+ years.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Much better than I anticipated.
- De JoEllen LeVitre en 08-30-20
-
The Majesty of the Law
- Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice
- De: Sandra Day O'Connor
- Narrado por: Bernadette Dunne
- Duración: 9 h y 30 m
- Versión completa
-
General4 out of 5 stars 87
-
Narración:4 out of 5 stars 44
-
Historia4 out of 5 stars 45
In this remarkable book, Sandra Day O’Connor explores the law, her life as a Supreme Court Justice, and how the Court has evolved and continues to function, grow, and change as an American institution. Tracing some of the origins of American law through history, people, ideas, and landmark cases, O’Connor sheds new light on the basics, exploring through personal observation the evolution of the Court and American democratic traditions.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Informative and well-written
- De James en 07-11-05
-
The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America
- The Thom Hartmann Hidden History Series
- De: Thom Hartmann
- Narrado por: Sean Pratt
- Duración: 4 h y 15 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 136
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 120
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 120
Taking his typically in-depth, historically informed view, Thom Hartmann asks: What if the Supreme Court didn't have the power to strike down laws? According to the Constitution, it doesn't. From the founding of the republic until 1803, the Supreme Court was the final court of appeals, as it was always meant to be. So where did the concept of judicial review start? As so much of modern American history, it began with the battle between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, and with Marbury v. Madison.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
A must read to understand why voting is essential.
- De Brandon WIlliams en 10-05-19
De: Thom Hartmann
-
Our Republican Constitution
- Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People
- De: Randy E. Barnett
- Narrado por: Barry Abrams
- Duración: 9 h y 2 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 149
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 126
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 124
The Constitution of the United States begins with the words "we the people". But from the earliest days of the American republic, there have been two competing notions of "the people", which led to two very different visions of the Constitution. Those who view "we the people" collectively think popular sovereignty resides in the people as a group, which leads them to favor a democratic constitution that allows the will of the people to be expressed by majority rule
-
3 out of 5 stars
-
Read the book, don't listen
- De I Keep AMZN in Business en 06-23-16
De: Randy E. Barnett
-
The Constitution
- An Introduction
- De: Michael Stokes Paulsen, Luke Paulsen
- Narrado por: Walter Dixon
- Duración: 14 h y 31 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 128
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 113
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 115
From war powers to health care, freedom of speech to gun ownership, religious liberty to abortion, practically every aspect of American life is shaped by the Constitution. This vital document, along with its history of political and judicial interpretation, governs our individual lives and the life of our nation. Yet most of us know surprisingly little about the Constitution itself, and are woefully unprepared to think for ourselves about recent developments in its long and storied history.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
The Constitution-A must reading for All Americans
- De Robert en 06-12-15
De: Michael Stokes Paulsen, y otros
-
Lies the Government Told You
- Myth, Power, and Deception in American History
- De: Andrew P. Napolitano
- Narrado por: Andrew Napolitano
- Duración: 11 h y 53 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 39
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 31
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 31
In Lies the Government Told You, Judge Andrew P. Napolitano reveals how America's freedom, as guaranteed by the US Constitution, has been forfeited by a government more protective of its own power than its obligations to preserve our individual liberties.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
A Must Read America 🇺🇸
- De Jamie Schaible en 05-30-23
-
Presumed Guilty
- How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Perry Daniels
- Duración: 11 h y 45 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 34
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 32
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 32
Presumed Guilty reveals how the Supreme Court allows the perpetuation of racist policing by presuming that suspects, especially people of color, are guilty.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Required Reading
- De Robert Bragaw en 02-26-23
-
A People's History of the Supreme Court
- The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution
- De: Peter Irons, Howard Zinn - foreword
- Narrado por: David Drummond
- Duración: 28 h y 32 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 114
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 105
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 104
A comprehensive history of the people and cases that have changed history, this is the definitive account of the nation's highest court.
-
4 out of 5 stars
-
Really enjoyed this book
- De Paul en 02-19-20
De: Peter Irons, y otros
-
Corruption in America
- From Benjamin Franklin's Snuff Box to Citizens United
- De: Zephyr Teachout
- Narrado por: Jo Anna Perrin
- Duración: 9 h y 36 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 102
-
Narración:4 out of 5 stars 89
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 88
For two centuries, the Framers' ideas about political corruption flourished in the courts, even in the absence of clear rules governing voters, civil officers, and elected officials. In the 1970s, the U.S. Supreme Court began to narrow the definition of corruption, and the meaning has since changed dramatically. No case makes that clearer than Citizens United.
-
4 out of 5 stars
-
Law Review+
- De Ben P. en 01-02-17
De: Zephyr Teachout
-
One Vote Away
- How a Single Supreme Court Seat Can Change History
- De: Ted Cruz
- Narrado por: Timothy Andrés Pabon
- Duración: 10 h y 8 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 1,359
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 1,195
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 1,187
In One Vote Away, you will discover how often the high court decisions that affect your life have been decided by just one vote. One vote preserves your right to speak freely, to bear arms, and to exercise your faith. One vote will determine whether your children enjoy their full inheritance as American citizens.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Intellectual and Insightful, so smartly written it became prophetic!
- De Kevin D. en 09-29-20
De: Ted Cruz
Las personas que vieron esto también vieron...
-
No Democracy Lasts Forever
- How the Constitution Threatens the United States
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Thomas May
- Duración: 7 h y 23 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 19
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 19
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 19
No Democracy Lasts Forever argues that the Constitution has become a threat to American democracy and must be dramatically changed or replaced if secession is to be avoided. Deeply troubled by the Constitution's inherent flaws, Erwin Chemerinsky, the renowned dean of Berkeley law school, came to the sobering conclusion that our nearly 250-year-old founding document is responsible for the crisis now facing American democracy.
-
4 out of 5 stars
-
Leftist, but he makes sense to me
- De Mike Liveright en 11-29-24
-
Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Henning
- Duración: 7 h y 9 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 70
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 59
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 58
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know the "original intent" of any provision.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Impeccably Logical, Backed by 100 Specific Example
- De Amy Eaton en 03-17-23
-
Presumed Guilty
- How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Perry Daniels
- Duración: 11 h y 45 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 34
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 32
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 32
Presumed Guilty reveals how the Supreme Court allows the perpetuation of racist policing by presuming that suspects, especially people of color, are guilty.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Required Reading
- De Robert Bragaw en 02-26-23
-
Closing the Courthouse Door
- How Your Constitutional Rights Became Unenforceable
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Mike Chamberlain
- Duración: 9 h y 52 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 14
-
Narración:4 out of 5 stars 12
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 12
The Supreme Court's decisions on constitutional rights are well known and much talked about. But individuals who want to defend those rights need something else as well: access to courts that can rule on their complaints. And on matters of access, the Court's record over the past generation has been almost uniformly hostile to the enforcement of individual citizens' constitutional rights.
-
3 out of 5 stars
-
Erwin not Edwin Mr. Chamberlain
- De Kindle Customer en 01-31-17
-
Reading the Constitution
- Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
- De: Stephen Breyer
- Narrado por: Stephen Breyer
- Duración: 12 h y 16 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 93
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 83
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 83
The relatively new judicial philosophy of textualism dominates the Supreme Court. Textualists claim that the right way to interpret the Constitution and statutes is to read the text carefully and examine the language as it was understood at the time the documents were written. This, however, is not Justice Breyer’s philosophy nor has it been the traditional way to interpret the Constitution since the time of Chief Justice John Marshall. Justice Breyer recalls Marshall’s exhortation that the Constitution must be a workable set of principles to be interpreted by subsequent generations.
-
2 out of 5 stars
-
Very Annoying Narration
- De Minnie I. en 04-21-24
De: Stephen Breyer
-
Supreme Inequality
- The Supreme Court's Fifty-Year Battle for a More Unjust America
- De: Adam Cohen
- Narrado por: Dan Woren
- Duración: 14 h y 16 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 181
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 159
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 156
In Supreme Inequality, best-selling author Adam Cohen surveys the most significant Supreme Court rulings since the Nixon era and exposes how, contrary to what Americans like to believe, the Supreme Court does little to protect the rights of the poor and disadvantaged; in fact, it has not been on their side for 50 years. Cohen proves beyond doubt that the modern Court has been one of the leading forces behind the nation’s soaring level of economic inequality, and that an institution revered as a source of fairness has been systematically making America less fair.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
A real eye opener!
- De alohathere en 05-28-20
De: Adam Cohen
-
No Democracy Lasts Forever
- How the Constitution Threatens the United States
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Thomas May
- Duración: 7 h y 23 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 19
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 19
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 19
No Democracy Lasts Forever argues that the Constitution has become a threat to American democracy and must be dramatically changed or replaced if secession is to be avoided. Deeply troubled by the Constitution's inherent flaws, Erwin Chemerinsky, the renowned dean of Berkeley law school, came to the sobering conclusion that our nearly 250-year-old founding document is responsible for the crisis now facing American democracy.
-
4 out of 5 stars
-
Leftist, but he makes sense to me
- De Mike Liveright en 11-29-24
-
Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Henning
- Duración: 7 h y 9 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 70
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 59
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 58
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know the "original intent" of any provision.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Impeccably Logical, Backed by 100 Specific Example
- De Amy Eaton en 03-17-23
-
Presumed Guilty
- How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Perry Daniels
- Duración: 11 h y 45 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 34
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 32
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 32
Presumed Guilty reveals how the Supreme Court allows the perpetuation of racist policing by presuming that suspects, especially people of color, are guilty.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Required Reading
- De Robert Bragaw en 02-26-23
-
Closing the Courthouse Door
- How Your Constitutional Rights Became Unenforceable
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Mike Chamberlain
- Duración: 9 h y 52 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 14
-
Narración:4 out of 5 stars 12
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 12
The Supreme Court's decisions on constitutional rights are well known and much talked about. But individuals who want to defend those rights need something else as well: access to courts that can rule on their complaints. And on matters of access, the Court's record over the past generation has been almost uniformly hostile to the enforcement of individual citizens' constitutional rights.
-
3 out of 5 stars
-
Erwin not Edwin Mr. Chamberlain
- De Kindle Customer en 01-31-17
-
Reading the Constitution
- Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
- De: Stephen Breyer
- Narrado por: Stephen Breyer
- Duración: 12 h y 16 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 93
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 83
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 83
The relatively new judicial philosophy of textualism dominates the Supreme Court. Textualists claim that the right way to interpret the Constitution and statutes is to read the text carefully and examine the language as it was understood at the time the documents were written. This, however, is not Justice Breyer’s philosophy nor has it been the traditional way to interpret the Constitution since the time of Chief Justice John Marshall. Justice Breyer recalls Marshall’s exhortation that the Constitution must be a workable set of principles to be interpreted by subsequent generations.
-
2 out of 5 stars
-
Very Annoying Narration
- De Minnie I. en 04-21-24
De: Stephen Breyer
-
Supreme Inequality
- The Supreme Court's Fifty-Year Battle for a More Unjust America
- De: Adam Cohen
- Narrado por: Dan Woren
- Duración: 14 h y 16 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 181
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 159
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 156
In Supreme Inequality, best-selling author Adam Cohen surveys the most significant Supreme Court rulings since the Nixon era and exposes how, contrary to what Americans like to believe, the Supreme Court does little to protect the rights of the poor and disadvantaged; in fact, it has not been on their side for 50 years. Cohen proves beyond doubt that the modern Court has been one of the leading forces behind the nation’s soaring level of economic inequality, and that an institution revered as a source of fairness has been systematically making America less fair.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
A real eye opener!
- De alohathere en 05-28-20
De: Adam Cohen
-
Against Constitutional Originalism
- A Historical Critique
- De: Jonathan Gienapp
- Narrado por: Josh Innerst
- Duración: 11 h y 37 m
- Versión completa
-
General4 out of 5 stars 6
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 5
-
Historia4 out of 5 stars 5
Constitutional originalism stakes law to history. The theory's core tenet—that the United States Constitution should be interpreted according to its original meaning—has us decide questions of modern constitutional law by consulting the distant constitutional past. Yet originalist engagement with history is often deeply problematic. In this comprehensive and novel critique of originalism, Jonathan Gienapp targets originalists' unspoken assumptions about the Constitution and its history.
-
2 out of 5 stars
-
Turgid Treatise
- De J. Peter Coll, Jr. en 01-31-25
De: Jonathan Gienapp
-
We the People
- A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Peter Berkrot
- Duración: 7 h y 53 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 48
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 39
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 39
From gun control to reproductive health, a conservative Supreme Court will reshape the lives of all Americans for decades to come. The time to develop and defend a progressive vision of the US Constitution that protects the rights of all people is now.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Hypocritical evaluation of the constitution
- De surya en 03-23-19
-
The Supermajority
- How the Supreme Court Divided America
- De: Michael Waldman
- Narrado por: Robertson Dean, Michael Waldman - introduction
- Duración: 11 h y 15 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 37
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 30
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 30
In The Supermajority, Michael Waldman explores the tumultuous 2021–2022 Supreme Court term. He draws deeply on history to examine other times the Court veered from the popular will, provoking controversy, and backlash. And he analyzes the most important new rulings and their implications for the law and for American society. Waldman asks: What can we do when the Supreme Court challenges the country?
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
This should be a serialized media presentation, for the return of some normalization of the Supreme Court.
- De Elaine en 06-08-23
De: Michael Waldman
-
The Originalism Trap
- How Extremists Stole the Constitution and How We the People Can Take It Back
- De: Madiba K. Dennie
- Narrado por: Madiba K. Dennie
- Duración: 7 h y 21 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 18
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 18
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 18
Lawyers don’t often admit this in mixed company, but Madiba Dennie wants to let you in on a secret: There's no one true way to interpret the Constitution. Americans saw just how subjective it can be when the Supreme Court denied basic bodily autonomy to millions of people in its Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, suggesting that our rights and liberties are frozen in a cherry-picked version of history. This is a line of constitutional interpretation called originalism—a framework that says we must be constrained by the meaning of the Constitution's text when it was written.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
A ray of hope in a bleak time
- De Emily S. Lakdawalla en 09-20-24
De: Madiba K. Dennie
-
Over Ruled
- The Human Toll of Too Much Law
- De: Neil Gorsuch, Janie Nitze
- Narrado por: Neil Gorsuch, Charles Constant
- Duración: 7 h y 28 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 208
-
Narración:5 out of 5 stars 182
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars 182
Over just the last few decades, laws in this nation have exploded in number; they are increasingly complex; and the punishments they carry are increasingly severe. Some of these laws come from our elected representatives, but many now come from agency officials largely insulated from democratic accountability. In Over Ruled, Neil Gorsuch and Janie Nitze explore these developments and the human toll so much law can carry for ordinary Americans.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
Hypocritical and one sided review of the state of the law.
- De AP en 08-10-24
De: Neil Gorsuch, y otros
-
The Shadow Docket
- How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine the Republic
- De: Stephen Vladeck
- Narrado por: Jonathan Todd Ross
- Duración: 11 h y 17 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 104
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 86
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 85
The Supreme Court has always had the authority to issue emergency rulings in exceptional circumstances. But since 2017, the Court has dramatically expanded its use of the behind-the-scenes “shadow docket,” regularly making decisions that affect millions of Americans without public hearings and without explanation, through cryptic late-night rulings that leave lawyers—and citizens—scrambling. But Americans of all political stripes should be worried about what the shadow docket portends for the rule of law, argues Supreme Court expert Stephen Vladeck.
-
4 out of 5 stars
-
Where was Vladeck?
- De SorenKMiller en 05-25-23
De: Stephen Vladeck
-
The Big Myth
- How American Business Taught Us to Loathe Government and Love the Free Market
- De: Naomi Oreskes, Erik M. Conway
- Narrado por: Liza Seneca
- Duración: 21 h y 27 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 93
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 80
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 80
In the early 20th century, business elites, trade associations, wealthy powerbrokers, and media allies set out to build a new American orthodoxy: down with 'big government' and up with unfettered markets. With startling archival evidence, Oreskes and Conway document campaigns to rewrite textbooks, combat unions, and defend child labor.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Refuting the Chicago School
- De Todd W. Laveen en 06-01-23
De: Naomi Oreskes, y otros
-
Where Tyranny Begins
- The Justice Department, the FBI, and the War on Democracy
- De: David Rohde
- Narrado por: Eric Jason Martin
- Duración: 9 h y 12 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 67
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 64
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 64
In Where Tyranny Begins, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Rohde investigates the strategies Trump systematically used to turn the country's two most powerful law-enforcement agencies into his personal political weapons. Rohde also reveals how, during the Biden years, Justice Department non-partisan 1970s norms that Attorney General Merrick Garland reinforced inadvertently helped Trump, and could fail to deliver a trial and legal accountability by Election Day 2024.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Review of why we fired trump
- De ludlow en 09-24-24
De: David Rohde
-
Tyranny of the Minority
- Why American Democracy Reached the Breaking Point
- De: Steven Levitsky, Daniel Ziblatt
- Narrado por: Fred Sanders
- Duración: 8 h y 49 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 313
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 281
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 281
America is undergoing a massive experiment: It is moving, in fits and starts, toward a multiracial democracy, something few societies have ever done. But the prospect of change has sparked an authoritarian backlash that threatens the very foundations of our political system. Why is democracy under assault here, and not in other wealthy, diversifying nations? And what can we do to save it?
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Tyranny of the Minority
- De orders en 10-07-23
De: Steven Levitsky, y otros
-
Erasing History
- De: Jason Stanley
- Narrado por: Dion Graham
- Duración: 4 h y 56 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 139
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 131
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 131
Combining historical research with an in-depth analysis of our modern political landscape, Erasing History issues a dire warning for America and the world: the worst fascist movements of humanity’s past began in schools; the same place so many of today’s right-wing political parties have trained their most vicious attacks. Yale professor Jason Stanley exposes the true danger of the right’s tactics and traces their inspirations and funding back to some of the most dangerous ideas of human history.
-
1 out of 5 stars
-
The bias attitude of the author
- De Elizabeth ohanna en 09-30-24
De: Jason Stanley
-
Autocracy, Inc.
- The Dictators Who Want to Run the World
- De: Anne Applebaum
- Narrado por: Anne Applebaum
- Duración: 4 h y 48 m
- Versión completa
-
General5 out of 5 stars 607
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 566
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 566
We think we know what an autocratic state looks like: There is an all-powerful leader at the top. He controls the police. The police threaten the people with violence. There are evil collaborators, and maybe some brave dissidents. But in the 21st century, that bears little resemblance to reality. Nowadays, autocracies are underpinned not by one dictator, but by sophisticated networks composed of kleptocratic financial structures, surveillance technologies, and professional propagandists, all of which operate across multiple regimes, from China to Russia to Iran.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
A Triumphant Work -Puts It All Together With Laser Clarity
- De Sjhoffman en 09-19-24
De: Anne Applebaum
-
Your Deceptive Mind: A Scientific Guide to Critical Thinking Skills
- De: Steven Novella, The Great Courses
- Narrado por: Steven Novella
- Duración: 12 h y 39 m
- Grabación Original
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 8,307
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 7,295
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 7,181
No skill is more important in today's world than being able to think about, understand, and act on information in an effective and responsible way. What's more, at no point in human history have we had access to so much information, with such relative ease, as we do in the 21st century. But because misinformation out there has increased as well, critical thinking is more important than ever. These 24 rewarding lectures equip you with the knowledge and techniques you need to become a savvier, sharper critical thinker in your professional and personal life.
-
3 out of 5 stars
-
Same Material Different Title
- De rkeinc en 09-21-14
De: Steven Novella, y otros
Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre The Case Against the Supreme Court
Calificaciones medias de los clientesReseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.
-
Total5 out of 5 stars
-
Ejecución4 out of 5 stars
-
Historia5 out of 5 stars
- Butch
- 05-19-23
Splendid!
The Professor insightfully and thoroughly explains why both "sides" on the Supreme Court fail and how we might improve the Court. His is a thorough and fair take on how we got to this point, with credible suggestions for court improvement.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña
esto le resultó útil a 1 persona