
The Case Against Impeaching Trump
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
3 meses gratis
Compra ahora por $20.00
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Lawrence Richardson
-
De:
-
Alan Dershowitz
“Maybe the question isn’t what happened to Alan Dershowitz. Maybe it’s what happened to everyone else.” (Politico)
Alan Dershowitz has been called “one of the most prominent and consistent defenders of civil liberties in America” by Politico and “the nation’s most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer and one of its most distinguished defenders of individual rights” by Newsweek. Yet he has come under partisan fire for applying those same principles to Donald Trump during the course of his many appearances in national media outlets as an expert resource on civil and constitutional law.
The Case Against Impeaching Trump seeks to reorient the debate over impeachment to the same standard that Dershowitz has continued to uphold for decades: the law of the United States of America, as established by the Constitution. In the author’s own words:
“In the fervor to impeach President Trump, his political enemies have ignored the text of the Constitution. As a civil libertarian who voted against Trump, I remind those who would impeach him not to run roughshod over a document that has protected us all for two and a quarter centuries. In this case against impeachment, I make arguments similar to those I made against the impeachment of President Bill Clinton (and that I would be making had Hillary Clinton been elected and Republicans were seeking to impeach her). Impeachment and removal of a president are not entirely political decisions by Congress. Every member takes an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution sets out specific substantive criteria that must be met.
I am thrilled to contribute to this important debate and especially that my book will be so quickly available to readers so they can make up their own minds.”
©2018 Alan Dershowitz (P)2018 Brilliance Publishing, Inc., all rights reserved.Listeners also enjoyed...




















Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:

Shoe on the other foot needs to be applied to everything political and in life.
I thoroughly enjoyed this book.
Awesome!!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Great book for the open minded
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Loved it!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Very rational and constitutionally based analysis
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Must read regardless of one’s political beliefs and/or affiliations
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
The reasonable left
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Loved this book!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
The Dersh!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Great
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Got screwed with the old book.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.