FEMINAZIS

Psycho-social portrait of extreme feminism and the risks of politically correct thinking dictatorship

De: felix wilson, tamara lopez

Narrado por: Virtual Voice

Betty Friedan once told Simone de Beauvoir that women should have the option of staying at home to raise children, and Beauvoir replied that they shouldn't have , since too many would choose. It is time to say that a certain derivation of the feminist movement has derived in a group that is very authoritarian -with respect to the life that other women must have- "FEMINAZIS: psycho-social portrait of extreme feminism and the risks of the dictatorship of correct political thought," is a revealing book regarding this phenomenon, from a perspective that cannot be found in the hegemonic discourse provided by the mainstream media. To discuss or to accept, it is a very different perspective from the one imposed as obligatory, it is the other bell. The philosophical and ideological currents that sustain the feminazi ideology, its historical roots, the central concepts of its mythology are presented - such as the mythical "Patriarchy", the "gender violence", the “glass roof” - from a deep research in the books that today are the indispensable references. In this book, you will find, even with a plain language, a very consistent historical, sociological, psychological investigation that can explain very well how correct it is to call them “feminazis” and how fascist philosophers influenced the today's feminist movement. In addition, the bases of the important social impact of feminazis are explored, such as reforms in Education programs to graft gender hatred and anti-family prejudice in new generations, new "gender" laws, the creation of the new feminazis courts, as well as the consolidation of a true dictatorship of correct political thought where repeating their dogmas is the obligatory step on the ladder to power of journalists, judicial and political officials, as well as contradicting them can provoke the most delirious and overactive forms of social expulsion and stigma. The challenge is a more human way of thinking. Each person is a sum of characteristics, is not their race, is not their height, is not their skin color, is not their gender, is not their form of sexual desire, is not their religious belief. Each person can deviate from the story that these "collectivist, paranoid and authoritarian ideologies" tell. Each person is not a representative of a group. Each person is unique, as is each life story and each destiny.